A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"

Post by **Mikey** » Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:34 pm

Interesting discoveries about "way back when:"

the earliest cosmological objects

Monroe · Post by **Monroe** » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:09 pm

Pretty cool find. But I found an error on part of the writer of the article. He said stars like our sun can continue for five billion years. Didn't he mean close to ten billion years?

Post by **Mikey** » Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:27 am

I thought he meant "continue from it's current age."

colmquinn · Post by **colmquinn** » Sat Aug 09, 2008 8:12 am

Mikey wrote:I thought he meant "continue from it's current age."

Phpt, whats a few billion between friends

A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"

A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"

Re: A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"

Re: A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"

Re: A "cosmic Rosetta Stone"