That's enough for the senior leadership and probably the skilled tradesmen on the Base. I'm sure if the Rebellion threw enough cash at Solo he would have helped out. Hell they gave him 7k over what he wanted to begin with.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Even if they could have convinced Solo to do that the Falcan has an upper limit of 50 people accoriding to the EU. (First NJO book I think)
Biggest design flaws ever!
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
Oh, I guess if he had a chance to make the jump to light-speed before the empire showed up he'd do it. But that still leaves the grunts, and without them who's gonna do the fighting?Cpl Kendall wrote:That's enough for the senior leadership and probably the skilled tradesmen on the Base. I'm sure if the Rebellion threw enough cash at Solo he would have helped out. Hell they gave him 7k over what he wanted to begin with.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Even if they could have convinced Solo to do that the Falcan has an upper limit of 50 people accoriding to the EU. (First NJO book I think)
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
The Rebeelion was greater than that one cell and besides if your going to lose the cell but have a choice of saving the leadership or saving the troopies, you save the leadership. It's easier to replace soldiers than replace a general.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Oh, I guess if he had a chance to make the jump to light-speed before the empire showed up he'd do it. But that still leaves the grunts, and without them who's gonna do the fighting?
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
Actually the rebels consolidated maybe a year or two prior so while true there were countless other cells elsewhere their main army was there.Cpl Kendall wrote:The Rebeelion was greater than that one cell and besides if your going to lose the cell but have a choice of saving the leadership or saving the troopies, you save the leadership. It's easier to replace soldiers than replace a general.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Oh, I guess if he had a chance to make the jump to light-speed before the empire showed up he'd do it. But that still leaves the grunts, and without them who's gonna do the fighting?
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
And? Does that somehow change the fact that you can replace troops easier than a General, or senatorial backers?Monroe wrote: Actually the rebels consolidated maybe a year or two prior so while true there were countless other cells elsewhere their main army was there.
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
No, but I'm saying that they would lose the bulk of their standing army. It'd be like if Washington lost the Contiental army. It'd be a huge strike against the American Revolution.Cpl Kendall wrote:And? Does that somehow change the fact that you can replace troops easier than a General, or senatorial backers?Monroe wrote: Actually the rebels consolidated maybe a year or two prior so while true there were countless other cells elsewhere their main army was there.
How many Minbari does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
None. They always surrender right before they finish the job and never tell you why.
-Remain Star Trek-
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
And how many would that be? At this point the Rebellion was little more than the space going equivilant of the Taliban, who aren't exactly flush with people.Monroe wrote: No, but I'm saying that they would lose the bulk of their standing army. It'd be like if Washington lost the Contiental army. It'd be a huge strike against the American Revolution.
- Graham Kennedy
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11561
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 2:28 pm
- Location: Banbury, UK
- Contact:
Re: Biggest design flaws ever!
And if Washington lost the continental army and all the generals and himself too, that would be even worse wouldn't it?Monroe wrote:No, but I'm saying that they would lose the bulk of their standing army. It'd be like if Washington lost the Contiental army. It'd be a huge strike against the American Revolution.Cpl Kendall wrote:And? Does that somehow change the fact that you can replace troops easier than a General, or senatorial backers?Monroe wrote: Actually the rebels consolidated maybe a year or two prior so while true there were countless other cells elsewhere their main army was there.
Give a man a fire, and you keep him warm for a day. SET a man on fire, and you will keep him warm for the rest of his life...