First, I'm not Catholic, nor am I belonging to any of Christendom's religions.Captain Seafort wrote:So, mass murder is an acceptable punishment for defending your city against aggressors is it? You could use a similar argument to say that every non-Catholic on the planet (all 5 billion of them) should be executed if they don't convert.Varthikes wrote:They were in defiance of God. They had the opportunity to turn around as did Rahab and the Gibeonites, who both demonstrated faith in Him.Captain Seafort wrote:And for this they deserved to be murdered to the last man woman and child?
Second, their crime was not that they were defending their city. Their crime, as I mentioned before, was turning to lifeless statues for worship and what they did in their worship of those statues. Sacrificing their children among other "things". "Things" that are all right in their natural use and intended place, but inappropriate in worship.
I was assuming he was referring to a certain account that took place after Jericho where some of the Isrealites secretly took plunder that was slated for destruction.It wasn't mere childish disobediance. It was outright rebellion and greed and it affected the entire nation of Israel.
Capital punishment for childish disobedience? This doesn't strike you as a tad excessive?
What rebellion? I was reffering to the Cpl's point about the Bible stating that children should be stoned if they disobeyed their parents.
Kendall: Perhaps you could point out the passage you had in mind about the stoning?