McAvoy wrote:Well didn't a huge chunk of one of Hawaii's islands slid into the sea because the islands are made on basically sand as opposed to hard rock?
Of course not recently though. More like 100,000 years ago.
AFAIK, the islands of Hawai'i are pretty much typical basaltic volcanic rock. There is definitely some continual subsidence and renewal, because the chain is along an active tectonic line; but I don't think there's a way for an island to be formed of sand rather than a small-grained variety of igneous rock.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
McAvoy wrote:Well didn't a huge chunk of one of Hawaii's islands slid into the sea because the islands are made on basically sand as opposed to hard rock?
Of course not recently though. More like 100,000 years ago.
AFAIK, the islands of Hawai'i are pretty much typical basaltic volcanic rock. There is definitely some continual subsidence and renewal, because the chain is along an active tectonic line; but I don't think there's a way for an island to be formed of sand rather than a small-grained variety of igneous rock.
I don't know. I just remember watching a documentary that was talking about how unstable the islands really are. They also talked about how easily the mountains can be brought down through erosion because it's not solid rock.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"
The island chain is moving because of the plates are moving. Just like the Super volcano in Yellowstone. The hot spot stays put and the crust moves over it.
"Don't underestimate the power of technobabble: the Federation can win anything with the sheer force of bullshit"