SolkaTruesilver wrote:A japanese tank, maybe.
![Image](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/76/Type10MBT.jpg)
ORLY?
SolkaTruesilver wrote:A japanese tank, maybe.
A Three Kingdoms game would be great. Loads of scope for it, lots of variation.SolkaTruesilver wrote:I wonder why everybody is always in awe about Japan and it's military history. What about China's thousands-year struggles?
Three Kindgom : Total War. For nice measure, add a few neighbouring kingdoms like Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Manchu. Add random barbarian invasions.
Make the Great Wall strategically significant.
That'd be a neat game... I mean, Japan is nice. But China just has so much more material to work with.
Were they really on par? Aren't there cases of katanas snapping in combat?Tyyr wrote:You're correct, all the work they put into the folding of blades was an attempt to mitigate the inherent deficiencies in their base metal. Katana vs. Medieval sword the material quality is about on par.
I think he reduced the "Western World" to "The US and it's media". It's a common mistake. The U.S. never really had much interest in India, as their sphere of influence never went deep there, as opposed to the U.K.Reliant121 wrote:I'd disagree to India, as when the Empire controlled India, the number of Indian dishes and such like that found their way into England was HUGE. A large proportion of middle to upper class victorian England was fascinated with India.
Of course, it was never as grand as the modern fascination with Japan. But thats purely because media today is an order of magnitude easier to distribute AND obtain.
Yeah, but so did European swords from time to time.Sionnach Glic wrote:Were they really on par? Aren't there cases of katanas snapping in combat?