Page 1 of 3

No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:51 am
by Lighthawk
Call it a love affair that began prenatally. I was born mere hours after my mom finished helping my dad install a Hurst floor shifter in his '55 Chevy. Later, I remember at the age of four asking Dad why he pushed on the pedal every time he moved the lever between the bucket seats of our '68 VW dune buggy. "That's the clutch," he told me. "I have to do that every time I want to change gears with the stick shift."

And so the fascination began. Shifting gears was fun, looked cool and sounded even cooler when you really wound up the revs. And in my first car, a 1976 Chevrolet Chevette, a manual transmission was mandatory to wring out what little performance its 70-bhp, 1.6-liter four-cylinder could muster. I still recall the day Dad took me out in it for my first driving test. I got in, took off with no problems and shifted up and down the gears with nary a gnash or a grind. He shouldn't have been surprised. I'd been studying his technique for years.

Now we come to the year 2010. The ability to drive a car equipped with a manual transmission is becoming a dying art. The sales numbers tell the story: In 1985, according to Ward's Communications, 22.4% of all vehicles sold in the United States came with a manual transmission. By 2007, the number had plummeted to 7.7%.

A quick check of vehicles for sale on AOL Autos tells a similar story. Of the 4,391,747 vehicles recently listed for sale, only 241,560 -- or 5.5% -- came with a manual.

The reasons for this situation are many. First, driver's education classes simply aren't teaching students how to drive a manual. We spoke with Eric Tunell at the Bob Bondurant School of High Performance Driving, perhaps the most well-known and highly regarded performance driving schools in the country, to get his perspective.

"With the teen drivers who attend our programs, their family car doesn't have a manual transmission, so they don't need to learn," he explained. "We also find that parents are mainly concerned with the safety of their teen driver and a manual is one more thing to distract them from focusing on driving."

That is not to say that none of the teens who attend Bondurant classes are uninterested in the art of self-shifting. "A significant number really want to know the ins and outs of driving a manual transmission," Tunell said. "What we emphasize at Bondurant is that ultimately it's not about the car; it's about the driver. Getting them training over and above what a basic driver's ed course offers is essential."

Another reason is fuel economy. In the past, manual transmissions got better fuel economy than automatics. Improvements in automatic transmission design, however, has helped them equal the fuel economy numbers of manuals, or at least come very close.

Modern traffic conditions have also helped contribute to the manual's demise. In today's stop-and-start traffic, the constant clutch-and-shift action is tiring. Combine that with the creaking knees of the aging baby boomer population and it's no wonder manual transmissions are going the way of the dodo.

That doesn't mean we have to like it, though. For the serious driver, piloting a car with a manual transmission is a badge of honor. Having control over your ride carries an appeal that may well go back to the time when man first rode astride a horse. That sort of intimate control over your steed is heady stuff, and a feeling not easily conceded. The conviction that the driver knows best also comes into play: an automatic transmission can't see that just down the road is a decreasing radius turn that's going to require you to downshift a gear or two so that you can launch yourself smartly out of the turn.

Then there is the pride one takes in a perfectly timed two-three upshift, wringing it out to the redline and listening to the symphony of pumping pistons and whirring camshafts, or perhaps mastering the black art of heel-and-toe shifting and precisely matching revs on a downshift as you drift into a corner.

Perhaps it is because, in a world that seems increasingly out of control, in the driver's seat you are in complete control, and with a manual transmission and an open road to the horizon, that is as much as we can hope for these days.
Source

I can't say I'm surprised how few cars are manuals anymore, but I hadn't thought it was so few. It's kind of a shame really. I didn't learn to drive with a manual, but I did learn to drive stick not long after I got my license. I'm rather glad to know how actually. Who else here can drive a manual transmission?

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:03 am
by Vic
I miss a stick shift, it was somewhat comical when I had the automatic right after 10 years of manual shifting. :)

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:34 am
by Sionnach Glic
AFAIK the majority of cars in Europe are manuals.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:04 am
by colmquinn
I personally only know 1 person who drives an automatic and that's because of a disability - like Sion G said its manual transmission mostly over here.

IMO its only people who can't drive "proper" cars play with those automatic things :)

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:08 am
by Vic
I'll let my wife know that, I'm pretty sure that I can predict the response though. :P :laughroll:

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:12 am
by colmquinn
No gears on a dodgem and look what happens there :)

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:26 am
by Lighthawk
Huh, well sounds like us Americans are as lazy as we're portrayed as being. Working a stick n clutch is just too much effort for us.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:43 pm
by Mikey
I could have guessed that ratio. When I worked a used car lot, standard-shifts tended to sit and gather dust. American laziness may be a factor, but there are others before we get too self-deprecating:

a) Cost. Automatics don't cost that much more than manuals anymore. Except for particular vehicles (see "b" below,) this eliminates most of the reason for having a stick shift. Except for budget-leader type vehicles, in which even saving the $300 or $400 for the auto represents a good fraction of the price, many vehicles don't even offer a manual anymore for this reason.

b) Function of newer automatic transmissions. You just don't lose that much with an automatic anymore. There are cars which beg for a manual, as I referenced above - a Corvette, Viper, or Camaro SS with an automatic is N-V-T-S nuts. For most other types of vehicles, however, autos work fine. They're available now with at least as many gears as corresponding standard shifts, and similar shift points. Adaptive automatics are available (at least from GM) which learn a particular driver's habits and adapt shift points to correspond. Manual Shift Modes, TAP-Shift, and F1-style paddle shifters are becoming widespread which allow the driver control of a manual without the need for a driver-operated clutch and which incorporate a governor to prevent excess wear or damage to the clutch. Difference in fuel economy is now limited to 1 or 2 mpg at very best, and guess how many times you have to replace the clutch in the entire lifetime of a typical car with an automatic transmission? Yep - zero. Even in the last bastion of manual transmissions - trucking - there are better alternatives. Even though trucking often requires greater control over the transmission, things like push-button hi-lo transmissions and Allisons with Manual Shift Mode have overtaken a lot of stick shifts in light- and medium-duty trucks; and I defy anyone to even find a new semi-rig without an AutoStick.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:01 pm
by Tyyr
The thing is that for many people a car is nothing more than a way to get from point A to point B. They don't really care about taking direct control of the machine. Leather seats, looking good, how much stuff can you pack into it, all these are far more important to them than being personally in charge of how the machine handles. So for these people an automatic is perfect. They didn't care about being able to shift before so why bother buying one?

Personally I'm kind of indifferent. Even when it comes to sports cars, so long as they have some way to control when you shift I don't really care if they have an automatic clutch. Now on a classic, like say a '66 Mustang, it had damn well better have a stick but that's about the only place I draw the line and demand a classic stick and clutch.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:11 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Something I'm curious about. Over here when you take your test to get a driver's license, you take the test in your own car. However, if your car is an automatic then your license only allows you to drive automatics. If you take the test with a manual then you're cleared for both types. Is it the same in the US, or are you allowed drive any car you like once you get your license?

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:34 pm
by Sonic Glitch
Sionnach Glic wrote:Something I'm curious about. Over here when you take your test to get a driver's license, you take the test in your own car. However, if your car is an automatic then your license only allows you to drive automatics. If you take the test with a manual then you're cleared for both types. Is it the same in the US, or are you allowed drive any car you like once you get your license?
AFAIK You are allowed to drive any car. I learned on, and took my test on an automatic but I wouldn't get a citation/ticket for being caught driving a manual. Though I would need some familiarization before I'd feel comfortable going out on the road.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 4:49 pm
by Reliant121
The thing i found even remotely interesting was that the Chevrolet Chevette could only get 70bhp out of a 1.6.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:10 pm
by Aaron
I can drive a manual but it hurts like a SoB.

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:07 am
by Mikey
I get the same thing. Try a Jeep Wrangler - after a year or so, the clutch usually loosens up enough that you don't have to use the pedal. :lol: My dad always said I should have learned like he did - on a Willy. :0

Re: No love for the stick

Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:14 am
by stitch626
I have never even attempted to drive stick. However, based on my method of learning and what a few people have said, I could probably learn after about five minutes of watching someone. At least if it was a decent transmission.