For those who haven't seen it yet, enjoy.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Didn't you see Batman Begins? Great film.Mikey wrote:I'm excited - somewhat. I haven't been thrilled with the film treatments of Frank Miller yet.
No, they drew from Miller's material, but it was its own story; I meant that this is a sequel to Begins.Mikey wrote:Was that from a Frank Miller book?
Totally agreed. It's almost like studios finally realized that actual story + realism = good movie and good returns.Monroe wrote:I really liked Batman Begins despite being really skeptical. This new serious look into hero movies seems to pay off. Bond's just the same way.
I would stake money on his performance in this, if I were a gambling person. The role got into his head so much that he couldn't sleep, and ended up od'ing on perscription pills. I'd say he put a lot into it.Mikey wrote:That is really the only way to translate Frank Miller. However, this film has Heath Ledger in it, which as I've said is a dubious note.
I dunno. I rather liked the REALLY old style bonds, with the weird death machines and Oddjobb and all that. Do you expect me to talk? Heh. I mean, i'm all for realism in mostmovies - after all, im the one who complained loudly during both the Torchwood season finale and the last Dr who about the directors completley fluffing nuclear saftey protocols - But at the same time i like the over the top Blowfeld style bond villains and traps. Im just a sucker for Art Deco, i suppose =pMonroe wrote:I really liked Batman Begins despite being really skeptical. This new serious look into hero movies seems to pay off. Bond's just the same way.
What I was referring to is the fact that Ned Kelly was the only role in which I liked Ledger's performance.Monroe wrote:What are you talking about? That role is to die for.Mikey wrote:That is really the only way to translate Frank Miller. However, this film has Heath Ledger in it, which as I've said is a dubious note.
*runs*