Best weapons of WW2

In the real world
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

Not really. :lol:
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Captain Seafort »

I disagree with your choice of tank. The Italian models became obsolete very quickly, but they were well-built, and superior a lot of other early war designs. Especially the Japanese ones that made the SMLE an effective a/t rifle.

SMG: Sten Mk II.
Anti-tank: Northover Projector.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

I'm not familiar with the Northover - was it really worse than the Boyse or the panzerbuchses?
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:I'm not familiar with the Northover - was it really worse than the Boyse or the panzerbuchses?
It was one of the various Heath Robinson contraptions that half the world and his brother was submitting to the War Office in May/June 1940. The theory was that since tankies really don't like fire, and Molotov cocktails can be fairly effective a/t weapons if they hit the right spot, a gunpowder-propelled Molotov mortor would be a great idea. The tendency of the bottles to break inside the breach made it somewhat less than universally loved.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

That would actually be a great idea if it weren't so stupid.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Deepcrush »

Compressed air would have been better then gunpowder.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

Deepcrush wrote:Compressed air would have been better then gunpowder.
It still would have burned a lot of users.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Deepcrush »

Hard to say, I made more then one PVC naplam styled launcher growing up. We had a fun "burn the Quasimoto doll" game once at summer camp when I was in boyscouts. We easily got fifty feet on some of our shots.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

Deepcrush wrote:Hard to say, I made more then one PVC naplam styled launcher growing up. We had a fun "burn the Quasimoto doll" game once at summer camp when I was in boyscouts. We easily got fifty feet on some of our shots.
Were you shooting scored glass bottles, though? Like I said, it could have been a great idea if it weren't so stupid. It doesn't seem that the "designers" of this Northover put as much thought into their design as you did one afternoon at scout camp.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Deepcrush »

Well I think it was more then one day, I'm pretty sure, and we started using paper cups and duct tape for container. Its impressive what you can do with foam and fuel with some sparking material...
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'm not familiar with the Northover - was it really worse than the Boyse or the panzerbuchses?
It was one of the various Heath Robinson contraptions that half the world and his brother was submitting to the War Office in May/June 1940. The theory was that since tankies really don't like fire, and Molotov cocktails can be fairly effective a/t weapons if they hit the right spot, a gunpowder-propelled Molotov mortor would be a great idea. The tendency of the bottles to break inside the breach made it somewhat less than universally loved.
I was doing a little digging, and now I'm forced to ask - was that really worse than the Smith Gun? Granted, a bottle of Willy Pete breaking in your breach while you're trying to fire it with black powder and a percussion cap isn't a great prospect; but the Smith Gun had, according to S. P. Mackenzie in The Home Guard: A Military and Political History, a "terrifying reputation for killing its crew."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:I was doing a little digging, and now I'm forced to ask - was that really worse than the Smith Gun?
Ouch. On the whole I'd have to call it a tie, on the grounds that a well-made Molotov is as nasty as WP. Overall, almost all the Home Guard's Heath Robinsons could be classified as "immobile", "ineffective", "lethal to the operators" or all three.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

The WP was a reference to the Northover; from what I read, it used a molotov-style WP grenade (the Home Guard not being able to procure much in the way of metal) as well as being able to fire bog-standard rifle grenades. The Smith Gun fired a more-or-less standard type of anti-tank cannon round, but was still described as terrifyingly lethal to its operators.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:The WP was a reference to the Northover; from what I read, it used a molotov-style WP grenade
Where did you get that from? From what I've read of it it used a bog-standard Molotov, not WP.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Best weapons of WW2

Post by Mikey »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Mikey wrote:The WP was a reference to the Northover; from what I read, it used a molotov-style WP grenade
Where did you get that from? From what I've read of it it used a bog-standard Molotov, not WP.
The aforementioned S. P. Mackenzie, as well as the War Office's Military Training Manual No. 42, referencing the "No. 76 Special Incendiary Grenade."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply