Page 7 of 12

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:10 pm
by JudgeKing
George Lucas is probably pissed that his prequels will never achieve this much fame as STXI will. :mrgreen:

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:35 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
He's also pissed that Trek's doing a better prequel than he did. :poke:

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 12:38 am
by CaptainQuantum
There is an article in the newspaper today about Riverside, Iowa, hoping to attract tourism as the birthplace of Kirk. Now I have heard of this town before but... has anyone told them that in ST:XI Kirk is born in a shuttle? They're gonna be so pissed. Also, from what we see, it doesn't look like this Kirk had a very happy childhood in Iowa.

Does anyone know if Kirk's birthplace is canonical? I ask because in ST:XI, his birth occurs not long after Nero arrives, altering the timeline. Presumably his father and pregnant mother would have been aboard the USS Kelvin in the original timeline too. Nero's attack could have made his mother go into labour prematurely, I suppose. In the original timeline they could've just strolled back to Earth and arrived in Iowa in plenty of time.

These are the sorts of things which play on my mind on public transport in the mornings.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:35 am
by thelordharry
CaptainQuantum wrote:There is an article in the newspaper today about Riverside, Iowa, hoping to attract tourism as the birthplace of Kirk. Now I have heard of this town before but... has anyone told them that in ST:XI Kirk is born in a shuttle? They're gonna be so pissed. Also, from what we see, it doesn't look like this Kirk had a very happy childhood in Iowa.

Does anyone know if Kirk's birthplace is canonical? I ask because in ST:XI, his birth occurs not long after Nero arrives, altering the timeline. Presumably his father and pregnant mother would have been aboard the USS Kelvin in the original timeline too. Nero's attack could have made his mother go into labour prematurely, I suppose. In the original timeline they could've just strolled back to Earth and arrived in Iowa in plenty of time.

These are the sorts of things which play on my mind on public transport in the mornings.
I'm curious CaptainQuantum (or 'Q' for short...)

I know you've probably not seen the film enough times to be able to remember every detail but would you say, on any level you could draw any sort of relationship from ENT at all? Maybe not directly, like a character saying "Yes, in 2152 when Captain Archer was commanding the NX01 etc etc" but an open statement that if you wanted to, you could read ENT canon in it? Having said that though, I get the impression that it's all based on a variation of original TOS canon and nothing else...

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:54 am
by thelordharry
CaptainQuantum wrote:...Does anyone know if Kirk's birthplace is canonical?...
Well I don't know about that but I have canon evidence that his full birth name is James R Kirk...

Image

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 5:27 pm
by Tsukiyumi
thelordharry wrote:I know you've probably not seen the film enough times to be able to remember every detail but would you say, on any level you could draw any sort of relationship from ENT at all? Maybe not directly, like a character saying "Yes, in 2152 when Captain Archer was commanding the NX01 etc etc" but an open statement that if you wanted to, you could read ENT canon in it? Having said that though, I get the impression that it's all based on a variation of original TOS canon and nothing else...
I know they mention an Admiral Archer, but that's the extent, so far as I know.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 5:53 pm
by Tyyr
Hopefully Admiral Archer was put in charge of important work, like ensuring each starship receives its correct allotment of potatoes and toilet paper.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:04 pm
by Tsukiyumi
Knowing Starfleet, they probably made him the Academy combat instructor...

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:06 pm
by Tyyr
"And when an alien swings at you make sure that you lean into the punch and lead with your chin."

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:13 pm
by thelordharry
Don't you be mean to Admiral Johnny Archer :)

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:16 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Hopefully Admiral Archer was put in charge of important work, like ensuring each starship receives its correct allotment of potatoes and toilet paper.
Hell, even that's too good for him. Need I remind you of how he couldn't even organise getting the fucking ship's supplies onboard in the first ep? A man of many talents he is not.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:17 pm
by Tyyr
They have one starship, ONE. How can you mess up the supply requests when only one person is requesting supplies?

Ya know though, if Archer was in charge of training security personnel that could explain some things.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:18 pm
by Sionnach Glic
They have one starship, ONE. How can you mess up the supply requests when only one person is requesting supplies?
I know. It's one hell of an impressive achievement to suck so heavily.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:20 pm
by Tyyr
Ya know, if all you ever watched of Enterprise was the first half of the first season you'd be absolutely convinced that the Vulcans were right, humans had no business in space.

By the end of the fourth season you knew they were right.

Re: ST:XI Spoiler Thread (READ AT OWN RISK)

Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:32 pm
by thelordharry
oh oh oh, I got one. Are there any orbital shots of Earth showing the US and there's a big score all the way down Florida? :)