Page 5 of 10
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:20 pm
by Reliant121
It seems that the original designs have been altered somewhat to include new plating and modifications. The Sovereign was shown with a small torpedo pod above the engineering hull, with its struts leading to the nacelles.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:05 pm
by stitch626
I'm just hoping i isn't a pay per month kinda deal... I can't afford that.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:32 pm
by Reliant121
It undoubtably will be. If it is anything similar to its cryptic predecessor whose name i cannot remember.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 4:43 pm
by Sionnach Glic
I won't be buying in that case. Unless it turns out to be fantasticaly good, but I doubt it.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:28 am
by stitch626
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
I hate money making schemes.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 1:38 am
by Tsukiyumi
stitch626 wrote:![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
I hate money making schemes.
Thus, why I've never played an MMORPG. I'm not paying a monthly bill for a damn video game.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:14 pm
by Enkidu
Reliant121 wrote:Not quite. Looking at the trailer, the main Fed ships that are seen that we recognize are Galaxy and Sovereign classes, but they appear to be heavily clad in armour plating. There was also a viewing of a Vor'cha class pummeling a Galaxy's nacelles to shreds.
The magazine article I read had a few screenshots, of which this is the main one:
http://www.startrekonline.com/gallery/screenshots
There are a couple of ring saucer vessels, another unfamilar type, and visable in this view, far larger than the one in print, a possible, modified Galaxy. Other shots off the site show the probable pimped up Sov you mentioned. I tried to view the trailer, but my increasingly obsolete half meg broadband connection struggles with downloads these days, so I lost patience.
I suspose these ships are "sexy" so that is why they appearing in the publicity shots, but if they went to get my attention, it's the old girls like the Miranda and Exclesior that turn me on.....
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:53 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Thus, why I've never played an MMORPG. I'm not paying a monthly bill for a damn video game.
Seconded. I pay
once to play a game: when I first buy it in a shop. I'm not going to be paying again and again if I want to keep playing.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:49 pm
by Mikey
I can barely keep up here - you think I'm going to pay a monthly subscription for something I barely get a chance to play?
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:18 pm
by Mark
If its a similar to Diablo's battlenet, then no problem. (it's free) But like the rest of you, I just don't think I can afford ANOTHER monthly bill.
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:43 am
by stitch626
Wow, I think we've stumbled onto something we all agree on...
![worried :worried:](./images/smilies/sad-smiley-062.gif)
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:38 am
by Sonic Glitch
And here goes space/time:
![Image](http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn83/trekker1710E/BlackHole.jpg)
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:45 am
by Mikey
*goes off to find duct tape*
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:46 am
by Sonic Glitch
*watches a supergate activated*
Re: Star Trek Online
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:02 am
by Mark
:::grabs the superglue:::