www.ditl.org

I live on Hoth apparently

8)

Real jackass, or Jackass?

Right... Horses are big, powerful, dangerous animals. Don't abuse them.

Ken Ham is a "Young Earth Creationist."
Bill Nye is a Science Guy.

Nutso wrote:Ken Ham is a "Young Earth Creationist."
Bill Nye is a Science Guy.

So was it fun seeing two people mentally jerk off? Because that is all that is.

Oh no, that guy, he's alright..........

Vic wrote:

Nutso wrote: So was it fun seeing two people mentally jerk off? Because that is all that is.

Don't know. Didn't see the debate. Just thought it was funny that evidence would have no effect on a scientist.

Nutso wrote:

Vic wrote:

Nutso wrote: So was it fun seeing two people mentally jerk off? Because that is all that is.

[/quote him on't know. Didn't see the debate. Just thought it was funny that evidence would have no effect on a scientist.

I don't get that. Isn't all debates basically a mentally jerk off?

Anyway Ken Ham thinks prior the Flood that people rode on Dinosaurs and all animals fit on a boat a third the size at best of the Titanic. He is also part of the Creation Museum.

Not all debates turn out to be that, unfortunatly most do. How many ways can I sneer at the other side tell them that they are idiots? Many are chest thumping (in a very academic way of course), and/or condemnation fests. When Bill Nye says that evidence will change his mind he means evidence that he will accept as such. All one has to do is listen to how a scientist reacts to "evidence" to see that one scientists evidence is anothers trash. Hence completely subjective, any pretenses of objectivity are just pipe dreams.

Vic wrote:Not all debates turn out to be that, unfortunatly most do. How many ways can I sneer at the other side tell them that they are idiots? Many are chest thumping (in a very academic way of course), and/or condemnation fests. When Bill Nye says that evidence will change his mind he means evidence that he will accept as such. All one has to do is listen to how a scientist reacts to "evidence" to see that one scientists evidence is anothers trash. Hence completely subjective, any pretenses of objectivity are just pipe dreams.

And yet, science works. So you're wrong.

Nutso wrote:

Vic wrote:

Nutso wrote: So was it fun seeing two people mentally jerk off? Because that is all that is.

Don't know. Didn't see the debate. Just thought it was funny that evidence would have no effect on a scientist.

Yeah... the religious are a funny breed. It must be nice to have "faith" and believe in something without having to worry about annoying things like evidence, proof or facts. It is also rather easy to claim victory in a debate when you don't worry about things like evidence, proof or facts.

I actually watched the two and a half hour debate. Ham is... special.