Re: The next Group Design Project
Posted: Sat Dec 05, 2009 2:00 am
I'm still going for the S31 series. A select team of S31 operatives on the underside of Starfleet. They could even pose as regular officers as well.
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://ns2.ditl.org/forum/
Can we have a Col. Flagg character? Please?Mark wrote:I'm still going for the S31 series. A select team of S31 operatives on the underside of Starfleet. They could even pose as regular officers as well.
Yeah, you got a point coming???Sonic Glitch wrote:I believe it's called "Daystrom RPG" [/shameless plug]Deepcrush wrote:Depending on how well it goes. I wouldn't mind seeing an RP out of it.
Eh, I'd rather have medical officer or chief engineer than captain or commander myself.Lt. Staplic wrote:your getting way ahead of the game....lol
I've got the first thread up now....we'll see how it goes, as for now, consider it a thought expirament.
Also I'll announce now that for the main characters, I had planned on having everyone come up with one or two really detailed characters then we can vote on who becomes captain, commander, ect.
If you want to start thinking about your character now, I'll post the template to fill out later.
I think it'd make more sense to do it the other way around, have people request the right to make a character for a certain role, than have a vote to see who gets it. Be a pain in the ass to write up a detailed character for a role and then get voted against. Not to say that the role is the entirety of the character, but it is going to be a fair part of them.Lt. Staplic wrote:same concept....
you can either develop your character aimed at one department/position, or you can leave them open (and roughly ageless) so that they can fit where ever. Or you can make one specialized character and one open character.
idk, I'd rather have the stats and descriptions there when I choose...that's why we can all create two/three characters.....Lighthawk wrote:I think it'd make more sense to do it the other way around, have people request the right to make a character for a certain role, than have a vote to see who gets it. Be a pain in the ass to write up a detailed character for a role and then get voted against. Not to say that the role is the entirety of the character, but it is going to be a fair part of them.Lt. Staplic wrote:same concept....
you can either develop your character aimed at one department/position, or you can leave them open (and roughly ageless) so that they can fit where ever. Or you can make one specialized character and one open character.