Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:44 pm
by Monroe
Mikey wrote:
And I think it would be an excelent idea for people to undergo 'parenting classes'. I mean, some people who have kids I wouldn't trust with a burnt out match. Let alone a life.
That part is dead on. But I can't in good conscience espouse a mandate for other people which I wouldn't want applied to me.
Well you'd have to take the same test too. Only difference is more than likely you'd pass it whereas my neighbors wouldn't :P

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:49 pm
by Mikey
Thanks for the vote of confidence. :wink:

By "mandate," however, I was referring to a state-issued moratorium on children per family.

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:30 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Such a thing might become needed on the near future, but can you imagine the uproar if they tried to implement it? As much sense as it may make, there is no way in hell such a law would ever be passed. And even if it was, do you think people are really going to obey it?

Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:33 am
by Monroe
Oh I agree they wouldn't be able to impliment it until it was too late. But its still a good idea ;)