www.ditl.org

Anyone who thinks hot-blooded men can just read a few passages in the good book and be freed of those pesky little sexual impulses isn't living on planet Earth. Porn serves a real purpose, much as some people hate to see it. I can think of quite a few ways of dealing with it that are far less healthy than wacking off to a Playboy centerfold...

Captain Picard's Hair wrote:Anyone who thinks hot-blooded men can just read a few passages in the good book and be freed of those pesky little sexual impulses isn't living on planet Earth. Porn serves a real purpose, much as some people hate to see it. I can think of quite a few ways of dealing with it that are far less healthy than wacking off to a Playboy centerfold...

They'll find a way. My father-in-law apparently isn't allowed to have porn but he's got quite the collection of 1990's Sears lingerie catalogues.

Cpl Kendall wrote: I doubt it is but as long as your not doing it on the front lawn then who will know?

Cpl Kendall wrote:

ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Do you really want to know the answer to that question?

Am I going to be summoned to appear in court? If not than fire away.

Well, she has roommates so they would know(maybe even help with setting up a scinario or two). And I'd probably mention something about it here. Any friends I have that don't talk to my parents. People along those lines.

WV's anti-sodomy laws were repealed in 1976. And in 2003 laws banning consensual sodomy were overturned by the US Supreme Court. Which means local laws are no longer valid

Thank goodness. My tongue is very happy now.

My father-in-law apparently isn't allowed to have porn

Poor guy. That's the great thing about my gf. She doesn't mind me looking at porn because she looks too.

ChakatBlackstar wrote:...Poor guy. That's the great thing about my gf. She doesn't mind me looking at porn because she looks too.

She's a keeper.

My wife didn't freak out when she saw the communal porn collection that my roomies and I had but it took a while to get to the point where she would watch it with me. Seven years later and she's buying it for us.

Cpl Kendall wrote:

Captain Picard's Hair wrote:Anyone who thinks hot-blooded men can just read a few passages in the good book and be freed of those pesky little sexual impulses isn't living on planet Earth. Porn serves a real purpose, much as some people hate to see it. I can think of quite a few ways of dealing with it that are far less healthy than wacking off to a Playboy centerfold...

They'll find a way. My father-in-law apparently isn't allowed to have porn but he's got quite the collection of 1990's Sears lingerie catalogues.

I did that when I was young. Now, of course, anyone with an internet connection is one click away from even the most depraved, bizzare porn they can imagine

Captain Picard's Hair wrote: I did that when I was young. Now, of course, anyone with an internet connection is one click away from even the most depraved, bizzare porn they can imagine

Thank the Emperor for the internet! Or maybe Al Gore.

[quote="Kendall]I checked out the official site, they want a permanent visa to get in. Though my trade is priority one for recruitment from Commonwealth militaries. If they were willing to help me get a Visa and pay my relocation I'd do it. Probably wouldn't pass the medical though.
[/quote]

Apply for a teaching job at one of the army schools. If you have a trade they'd kill to have you. I know mechanic in the army who is teaching a bunch of new recruits the treade. All hands on stuff with only basic paper work.

Oddly enough, I own no porn of any kind. THere is no reason for it, I just don't have any.

Teaos wrote: Apply for a teaching job at one of the army schools. If you have a trade they'd kill to have you. I know mechanic in the army who is teaching a bunch of new recruits the treade. All hands on stuff with only basic paper work.

Thanks man, I'm going to look into that.

ChakatBlackstar wrote:

Tsukiyumi wrote:I fail to see how this would help anything. Religious fundamentalist BS has no place dictating military policy. Makes me want to go bulldoze a few churches.

Religion, Christianty especially, has no place dictating military policy. It's one of their commandments, the ninth I believe, is "Thou shalt not kill". And that's one of the points of a military in the first place.

The commandment is read more correctly as "Thou shall not MURDER." Otherwise, it wouldn't make any sense - there's more warfare and bloodshed in the Old Testament than in almost any other book I can think of.

Mikey wrote:
The commandment is read more correctly as "Thou shall not MURDER." Otherwise, it wouldn't make any sense - there's more warfare and bloodshed in the Old Testament than in almost any other book I can think of.

Yeah the untranslated version says "thou shall not murder".