www.ditl.org

Reliant121 wrote:Got to agree with Teaos, ESB is my least favourite wars film. I cannot stand it, it feels...like virtually nothing happens. I know there's quite a bit of character development but it just isn't interesting to me.

I also dislike TOS mostly because it is difficult for me to appreciate how "revolutionary" it was since the era in which it was made was roughly 3 decades before I was even conceived. Without that contextual appreciation, it just seems horribly dated.

Teaos wrote:Mwahahaha. McAvoy your opinion is old and obsolete, please join mikey in the seniors centre.

Reliant121 wrote:Got to agree with Teaos, ESB is my least favourite wars film. I cannot stand it, it feels...like virtually nothing happens. I know there's quite a bit of character development but it just isn't interesting to me.

I also dislike TOS mostly because it is difficult for me to appreciate how "revolutionary" it was since the era in which it was made was roughly 3 decades before I was even conceived. Without that contextual appreciation, it just seems horribly dated.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Reliant121 wrote:Got to agree with Teaos, ESB is my least favourite wars film. I cannot stand it, it feels...like virtually nothing happens. I know there's quite a bit of character development but it just isn't interesting to me.

I also dislike TOS mostly because it is difficult for me to appreciate how "revolutionary" it was since the era in which it was made was roughly 3 decades before I was even conceived. Without that contextual appreciation, it just seems horribly dated.

There's actually a term for that. Seinfeld is unfunny.

Tsukiyumi wrote:I never thought Seinfeld was funny, even when it was on. Not my type of humor, I guess.

Vic wrote:double post

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Reliant121 wrote:Got to agree with Teaos, ESB is my least favourite wars film. I cannot stand it, it feels...like virtually nothing happens. I know there's quite a bit of character development but it just isn't interesting to me.

I also dislike TOS mostly because it is difficult for me to appreciate how "revolutionary" it was since the era in which it was made was roughly 3 decades before I was even conceived. Without that contextual appreciation, it just seems horribly dated.

There's actually a term for that. Seinfeld is unfunny.

Sonic Glitch wrote: That's a dangerous link my friend...

IanKennedy wrote: Seinfeld isn't unfunny, it's annoying. It's just people going on and on and on about stupid things. Always was that way.

IanKennedy wrote:

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Reliant121 wrote:Got to agree with Teaos, ESB is my least favourite wars film. I cannot stand it, it feels...like virtually nothing happens. I know there's quite a bit of character development but it just isn't interesting to me.

I also dislike TOS mostly because it is difficult for me to appreciate how "revolutionary" it was since the era in which it was made was roughly 3 decades before I was even conceived. Without that contextual appreciation, it just seems horribly dated.

There's actually a term for that. Seinfeld is unfunny.

Seinfeld isn't unfunny, it's annoying. It's just people going on and on and on about stupid things. Always was that way.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

Sonic Glitch wrote: That's a dangerous link my friend...

I absolve myself of any responsibility.

RK_Striker_JK_5 wrote:

IanKennedy wrote: Seinfeld isn't unfunny, it's annoying. It's just people going on and on and on about stupid things. Always was that way.

Well, what it means is, something can come along and be so revolutionary and so groundbreaking for its time. Then as imitators crop up, subsequent generations look back on it and wonder why it was so 'out there' in the first place.