Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:20 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Looks nice.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:30 am
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Rochey wrote:Unnecesary? Yeah. But why wasteful?
It's a t's a waste of time, of money, of space...
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:43 am
by Mikey
No it's not. If you don't want it, don't buy it - then you have expended no time, money, or space.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:19 am
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Mikey wrote:No it's not. If you don't want it, don't buy it - then you have expended no time, money, or space.
In general, it is. I just see no need for remastering of... well, anything.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:18 pm
by Mikey
No, there is no NEED. It's a question of "want" - does Paramount want to make more money from one of their properties, and do any fans want to see it in its remastered incarnation? The answer to the first questions is oviously "yes," and to the second question... yeah, it appears that some do.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:28 pm
by Sionnach Glic
There doesn't need to be a particular need for anything. There's no particular reason for me to buy five pairs of socks when I only need to buy three. Does this mean the extra two pairs are a waste? Nope, because I'll still use them.
Same for the remastered versions. I, personaly, don't particularly care about the graphics. But a lot of people do, and they'd like to see the effects redone. If they buy the remastered version, they'll watch them and get enjoyment out of them. Therefore, they have served their purpose.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:18 pm
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Well, for those who buy it, I legit hope you enjoy it. I just don't see the need-in any sense of the word-to tamper with it.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 9:14 pm
by Sionnach Glic
True, and I also think that there's little point in updating the graphics. Though I can see why they are doing it.