Fixed your fix.Mikey wrote:Fixed, apparently.Captain Seafort wrote:It's simply a matter ofidentifyingchoosing to ignore which definitionmost closely fitshas least to do with the subject.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fa1/04fa1331408f7770622323ec79ef6225b36c3475" alt="Razz :P"
Fixed your fix.Mikey wrote:Fixed, apparently.Captain Seafort wrote:It's simply a matter ofidentifyingchoosing to ignore which definitionmost closely fitshas least to do with the subject.
I'm afraid I must admit my lack of your knowledge of northern European history. I guess you're talking about the Lion of the North, but I don't recognize the carousel reference.Captain Seafort wrote:Not really - too indecisive. Gustavus was right to abandon it and return to driving the charge home.
Well, I guess it paid off because the Lion did rather well for himself. However, I was referring to the carnival ride.Captain Seafort wrote:It's a variation on a cavalry tactic popular in the 16th and early 17th centuries. The intention was to try and maintain cavalry as an effective force in the gunpowder age by arming them with pistols and having them ride round and round in circles, successively firing and then retiring to reload - the caracole. This, while it provided an answer of sorts to the combination of pike and musket prevalent at the time, prevented the cavalry from playing a truly decisive role. Gustavus Adolphus binned the concept and returned the cavalry to the role of delivering shock action with sword and sabre.
Been there, done that, Sharpe won.Deepcrush wrote:Just make a poll already, Chuck Norris or the "whoever" that Seafort is talking about.
Doing the poll in the UK would be clearly biased. It should be worldwide... with the third option being "Who are they?" just for fun.Captain Seafort wrote:Been there, done that, Sharpe won.Deepcrush wrote:Just make a poll already, Chuck Norris or the "whoever" that Seafort is talking about.
It was world wide, or at least as world wide as DITL - Mr T vs Norris, with an option for "other - say who". "Other" won, with a long list of reasons why Sharpie is badass.stitch626 wrote:Doing the poll in the UK would be clearly biased. It should be worldwide... with the third option being "Who are they?" just for fun.
That is not nearly a large enough sample size to justify a concrete answer to this most pressing question.Captain Seafort wrote:It was world wide, or at least as world wide as DITL - Mr T vs Norris, with an option for "other - say who". "Other" won, with a long list of reasons why Sharpie is badass.stitch626 wrote:Doing the poll in the UK would be clearly biased. It should be worldwide... with the third option being "Who are they?" just for fun.
It's not really a pressing question, since EVERYONE is owned by Mr Rogers.stitch626 wrote: That is not nearly a large enough sample size to justify a concrete answer to this most pressing question.