www.ditl.org

And we had a fellow recently stand up in court and tell the judge that he was not subject to the laws of the United States, as he was a Subject of the Hawaiian Monarchy. He said he'd only accept the judgement of another royal personage, insinuating they'd have to send him to England to have the Queen try him.

He got extra time for contempt of court.

Dumbass.

Erm... didn't Liliuokeilani voluntarily accede to statehood?

Mikey wrote:Erm... didn't Liliuokeilani voluntarily accede to statehood?

At gun point yes.

Yes, Hawaii's intro into the US was a bit rough and not at all a happy one.

As for a computer being able to be programmed with information and being able to pull it up at will? Color me suprised . Although I think that the whole exercise was about computer/human interaction, and the computer came through with flying colors, a definite step forward.

The big deal with Watson isn't just that it has a massive database (it does), but that it's able to make logical connections to information based on sometimes illogical clues.

Interesting that they complain that the computer had a big advantage not in the quality of it's response, but the speed - it beat them to the buzzer a lot, basically. I find that quite telling... as soon as a computer can do a typically Human skill at all, it automatically wins because it does it faster and more efficiently. If - when - they get to a point where you can have a decent conversation with a computer, I imagine it might be quite disquieting to talk to somebody who always has a well thought out answer right then and there... never a hesitation to think, never a search for the right word to use, never tripping over a badly constructed sentence.

Deepcrush wrote:

Mikey wrote:Erm... didn't Liliuokeilani voluntarily accede to statehood?

At gun point yes.

What? The Hawai'i Republican Party was voted out of office internally within Hawai'i before any admission activity from the U.S.