Huh....you don't see Army tanks crashing into stuff, do ya?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ed63/9ed63b42578f9fa50b1517640ba4167b5edfbeed" alt="Poke :poke:"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBLV0mCZh3gMark wrote:And the famous one in Hawaii....the one that sank that Japaneese fishing boat....the something Maru (name slips my mind).
Huh....you don't see Army tanks crashing into stuff, do ya?
2nd time this week that excuse is brought up!Mark wrote:Baa...they meant to do that.
Nitpick - that isn't a tank, it's a Bradley.Lighthawk wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBLV0mCZh3gMark wrote:And the famous one in Hawaii....the one that sank that Japaneese fishing boat....the something Maru (name slips my mind).
Huh....you don't see Army tanks crashing into stuff, do ya?
Can't - it's neither hostile, nor has a huge great union flag on it.Mark wrote:Baa...they meant to do that.
Eh, close enough.Captain Seafort wrote:Nitpick - that isn't a tank, it's a Bradley.
Same thing. This time, we're just being really proactive about protecting the Potomac region better.Captain Seafort wrote:nor has a huge great union flag on it.
Nope, I can't hear anything over the sound of hulls grinding against the seabed.GrahamKennedy wrote:Man, you can just hear the sound of careers shattering left and right, can't you?
The fact that we have so few boats is the reason he's going to be out on his ear. The US Navy can loose an aircraft carrier or two and not notice. We can loose a minesweeper without a noticeable chunk of the navy disappearing.Tyyr wrote:You got like what, six ships? Not a lot of skippers to pick from. Can you afford to start tossing them out?