Huh?Mikey wrote:In practice, however... NJ's seat belt law means yo can't technically get pulled over with lack of a a seat belt as the reason
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e013/5e013ca59c9d9aaa211c526e2bf0c41adcc91dce" alt="Confused :?"
Huh?Mikey wrote:In practice, however... NJ's seat belt law means yo can't technically get pulled over with lack of a a seat belt as the reason
So far, so good.Mikey wrote:In this case, the law is written such that it is illegal to be in a moving car without your seatbelt on if in the front seats, or if under twelve years of age in the rear.
What blithering idiot was responsible for that? Over here anyone who's caught without a belt will get pulled over and fined.However, it is not allowed for police to make a traffic stop for the reason of belt-less-ness.
As will many people here, if the cops are sufficiently motivated by impending ticket quotas. The difference is that the issuing officer must have a reasonable excuse for the traffic stop, other than the infraction for which the citation was issued.Captain Seafort wrote:What blithering idiot was responsible for that? Over here anyone who's caught without a belt will get pulled over and fined.
I assumed so, based on the fact that Mikey was specifically talking about NJ.Tsukiyumi wrote:Seafort - depends on what state.
Are you trying to tell me that the state that produced Dubya and creationist textbooks also has sane laws?Here in Texas there's a slogan: "Click it or ticket", and they can pull you over for it. Also, all passengers (and the driver, of course) must be wearing seatbelts regardless of age or location in the vehicle.
Same in Iowa....Tsukiyumi wrote:Seafort - depends on what state. Here in Texas there's a slogan: "Click it or ticket", and they can pull you over for it. Also, all passengers (and the driver, of course) must be wearing seatbelts regardless of age or location in the vehicle.