www.ditl.org

Mark wrote:I wonder how I could spark a march like this in Hawaii.

Play the ethnic card? Hawaiians were topless before we came here! How dare we deny a cultural right?!

Mark wrote:And how the hell is that lady going to prevent an audience next time anyway?

No clue. Pepper spray? Ugly women?

Mmmm, topless island girls.

Believe me....you'd pay most of them to keep their tops on.

Shut up, I don't need your reality while replaying an X rated version of "South Pacific" in my head.

Mark wrote:Believe me....you'd pay most of them to keep their tops on.

I think most of us would pay 80% of women to keep their tops on in general.

Tyyr wrote:Shut up, I don't need your reality while replaying an X rated version of "South Pacific" in my head.

Tyyr wrote:Shut up, I don't need your reality while replaying an X rated version of "South Pacific" in my head.

Mark wrote:

Tyyr wrote:Shut up, I don't need your reality while replaying an X rated version of "South Pacific" in my head.

I reject your reality and substitute my own!

I'm still wondering about the bit that said that toplessness was legal for both sexes in the location of this protest. So, what's to protest? That would be like me protesting for a "right on red" law here in New Jersey... where a right on red is perfectly legal.

No, no Mikey, this is social commentary not legal.

"I dont like men looking at me topless! I think theres a really simple and easy way to solve this, and thats GO TOPLESS AND PROTEST IT!"



just...no.

Mikey wrote:I'm still wondering about the bit that said that toplessness was legal for both sexes in the location of this protest. So, what's to protest? That would be like me protesting for a "right on red" law here in New Jersey... where a right on red is perfectly legal.

I think they're protesting not the law, but the double-standard that if a guy goes around with no top, no one even notices, but if a woman goes around with no top, every man in a five mile radius will immediately converge on her location.

I guess they just didn't like having their point proven for them.

Sionnach Glic wrote:

Mikey wrote:I'm still wondering about the bit that said that toplessness was legal for both sexes in the location of this protest. So, what's to protest? That would be like me protesting for a "right on red" law here in New Jersey... where a right on red is perfectly legal.

I think they're protesting not the law, but the double-standard that if a guy goes around with no top, no one even notices, but if a woman goes around with no top, every man in a five mile radius will immediately converge on her location.

I guess they just didn't like having their point proven for them.

Then, they're not looking at the right men. I know plenty of men who - for either the right reasons or absolutely, hideously wrong ones - attract a great deal of female (and gay male) attention when topless.

Anyway, here's my summation: NEWS FLASH, LADIES! GUYS LIKE BOOBS!

I know that if I'm down the beach and theres a relatively young guy with bare chest, I sure as hell am going to take notice.

I was also going to bring up the hypocrisy of that; women look at bare-chested guys and get excited, so what's the f*cking problem here, exactly?