Re: Shroud of Turin -- The Real Deal?
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:49 am
I have one thing more to say to thing whole thing.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Banging head against wall :bangwall:](./images/smilies/1892.gif)
![laughroll :laughroll:](./images/smilies/laughing-smiley-014.gif)
![Suicide :suicide:](./images/smilies/suicide.gif)
![Doh :doh:](./images/smilies/doh.gif)
![Whack :whack:](./images/smilies/whack.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
https://ns2.ditl.org/forum/
The date is only one of the many reasons we know the thing is a fake. Not the least of which is the guy who "found" it coped to it being a forgery he made.SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:I thought the Carbon Dating was in dispute due to a fire in the 1300's which could have damaged the Shroud.
That's what makes them "believers"GrahamKennedy wrote:. But believers seem determined to paint it as real, no matter what.
I read a book where Christ's DNA was used to try and cure a brutal serial killer.............could Christ's holy nature save a man from his own demons? Since it was a Christian author......yes.Tsukiyumi wrote:I was kinda pissed when they "debunked" it; I had an idea for a story about scientists trying to clone Jesus from the DNA on the shroud, and creating a horrifying monster instead. That one had potential, dammit!
"Morons".Sonic Glitch wrote:That's what makes them "believers"GrahamKennedy wrote:. But believers seem determined to paint it as real, no matter what.