Page 2 of 2

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:05 pm
by Mikey
I'm not trying to absolve the doctor; I'm trying to claim that there is a burden of responsibility that still rests on Jackson himself.

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:08 pm
by stitch626
And no one is saying otherwise. But you can't put a dead man on trial.

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:08 pm
by Sionnach Glic
Indeed, they're both at fault.

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:21 pm
by Nickswitz
stitch626 wrote:And no one is saying otherwise. But you can't put a dead man on trial.
One day, I'm gonna become a lawyer just to do that...

See how many people look at me funny for the rest of my life... Haha, nah, I don't want to be a lawyer really.

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:11 pm
by Lighthawk
Nickswitz wrote:
stitch626 wrote:And no one is saying otherwise. But you can't put a dead man on trial.
One day, I'm gonna become a lawyer just to do that...

See how many people look at me funny for the rest of my life... Haha, nah, I don't want to be a lawyer really.
Yeah, you don't want to be lawyer...you want to be necromancer. That's how you put a dead man on trial.

Re: Michael Jackson's Death Ruled Homicide

Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:11 pm
by IanKennedy
Mikey wrote:So, let's take a hypothetical trip back in time. If I had managed to kill myself on a meth bender, you're really saying it would be someone else's fault? I mean, I decided to take the drugs, but I'm no biochemist, so it's not my fault, right?
No, you are guilty of taking the stuff, but your supplier is also guilty of supplying them. When it's a professional doing the providing then it's their job to know better.