Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:45 pm
Only half?
Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:49 pm
sad, to think, that i actually sympathised with Dubaya when he cut his cheek open, after collapsing due to choking on a pretzel, if only i had a time machine...
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:52 pm
Just think of the possibilities if Dubya had actually passed away from that pretzel and Cheney had carried on as Pres.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:56 pm
Of course. Think of all the fortunate third world inhabitants that never heard of him.Only half?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:59 pm
If Cheney, the hawk of hawks, had replaced Dubaya, wouldn't we brits actually be, carpet bombed for being 'unamerican' and thus 'possibly a communist', or a 'heathen' ?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:05 pm
Doubt it. The Republicans needed all the poodles they could get to try and legitimise their war (and all the "allies" they could get to spread the blame across when it all went pear-shaped). New Labour fitted the bill perfectly.Granitehewer wrote:If Cheney, the hawk of hawks, had replaced Dubaya, wouldn't we brits actually be, carpet bombed for being 'unamerican' and thus 'possibly a communist', or a 'heathen' ?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 9:26 pm
I think its 73% by the current pollsRochey wrote:I think half the planet agrees with you there...
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:32 pm
Pfft.
Every one knows that 85% of all statistics are completely made up.
Every one knows that 85% of all statistics are completely made up.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:37 pm
i though the figure was 99% =p </sarcasm>Rochey wrote:Pfft.
Every one knows that 85% of all statistics are completely made up.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:43 pm
No, no, no, you're both wrongceleritas wrote:i though the figure was 99% =p </sarcasm>Rochey wrote:Pfft.
Every one knows that 85% of all statistics are completely made up.
It's 75.6%.
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:23 pm
The fact is, Cheney wouldn't bomb anyone. He might have liked to, if he took over the presidency, but having three heart attacks per week leaves little time for anything else (besides pandering to your big oil comapny buddies... did I say that? 
)
)Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:58 pm
Cheney probably would be impeached because he lacks even the "I'm a simple country bumpkin" charisma that Bush has.
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:08 pm
Don't underestimate Cheney's force of personality... who else could shoot someone in the face and have THEM apologize for it?
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2007 2:05 pm
yes...i thought that the senator was a.........partridge...........yes........thats right...........a partridge
Well it might have been another rank of official, and a quail or grouse or pheasant, but still.........................COME ON!!
Well it might have been another rank of official, and a quail or grouse or pheasant, but still.........................COME ON!!
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:54 am
The mob?Mikey wrote:Don't underestimate Cheney's force of personality... who else could shoot someone in the face and have THEM apologize for it?