Page 2 of 6

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 1:48 am
by Aaron
Duskofdead wrote:
They definitely look very stripped.
Everything in TOS was stark and minimalist though, so they fit.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:06 am
by Teaos
Image

I dont like the look.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:13 am
by Aaron
Did someone say you had to? :?

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:15 am
by Teaos
Just saying. And since people around here seem to dislike the nacelles being out in the open the fewer of them the better probably.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:37 am
by Aaron
Teaos wrote:Just saying. And since people around here seem to dislike the nacelles being out in the open the fewer of them the better probably.
It has it's charms, if your a big TOS fan. I know your not though. :wink:

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:53 am
by Duskofdead
Cpl Kendall wrote:
Duskofdead wrote:
They definitely look very stripped.
Everything in TOS was stark and minimalist though, so they fit.
Well I know it sounds silly but, aesthetically speaking, starships to me always sort of look like they could "skim through water." When I see one-nacelled ships, they look like if they tried to stay vertical in the water, they'd flip over. They just look... imbalanced?

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:55 am
by Aaron
Duskofdead wrote:
Well I know it sounds silly but, aesthetically speaking, starships to me always sort of look like they could "skim through water." When I see one-nacelled ships, they look like if they tried to stay vertical in the water, they'd flip over. They just look... imbalanced?
Well this is space, so you could design a flying starfish if you chose too. Think of the one nacelle's as hydrofoils.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:59 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Cpl Kendall wrote:
Duskofdead wrote:
Well I know it sounds silly but, aesthetically speaking, starships to me always sort of look like they could "skim through water." When I see one-nacelled ships, they look like if they tried to stay vertical in the water, they'd flip over. They just look... imbalanced?
Well this is space, so you could design a flying starfish if you chose too. Think of the one nacelle's as hydrofoils.
That's how I thought of it when I came up with the skim-drive in my series.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:59 am
by Teaos
If you build them so they are smooth they can you through planets atmospheres and gas giants a lot easier than not smooth ships.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:01 am
by Aaron
Teaos wrote:If you build them so they are smooth they can you through planets atmospheres and gas giants a lot easier than not smooth ships.
Why would you want to? They have shuttles for that.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:02 am
by Blackstar the Chakat
Cpl Kendall wrote:
Teaos wrote:If you build them so they are smooth they can you through planets atmospheres and gas giants a lot easier than not smooth ships.
Why would you want to? They have shuttles for that.
Those things tend to crash a lot though. (Plot device)

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:03 am
by Teaos
And to hide, I cant remember why or when but the E-D was in a star for awhile. More than once IIRC.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:11 am
by Aaron
ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Those things tend to crash a lot though. (Plot device)
Yeah, and they breed like rabbits.
And to hide, I cant remember why or when but the E-D was in a star for awhile. More than once IIRC.
That's pretty rare though. A better investment would be a cloak or other stealth technology.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:13 am
by RK_Striker_JK_5
Thanks for that, Teaos. *Whistles* Man, what a beauty...

I've personal canonized most of those TOS designs. Heck the Paladin-class was a TOS version of the Miranda, there.

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:17 am
by Teaos
That's pretty rare though. A better investment would be a cloak or other stealth technology.
Not allowed to do that.