The Constitution class starship.

The Original Series
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:Now, if we could just get Starfleet to use vessels the way they're intended...
Fat chance of that - they'd probably send the Defiants off looking at interesting planets and have the Novas fighting battles. Both have been known to happen.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

Ships don't really get sent into situations they werent designed for. They seem to end up there.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Well, it is true that plans last until the first shot is fired; however, Starfleet does seem to have a generally philosophy of using any ship for any role, even if the "multirole" capability of said ship is severely biased one way or the other.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Fat chance of that - they'd probably send the Defiants off looking at interesting planets and have the Novas fighting battles. Both have been known to happen.
Considering the Defiant ended up as Sisko's personal taxi througout the series, I don't have much hope of Starfleet getting any better with using their ships inteligently.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Considering the Defiant ended up as Sisko's personal taxi througout the series...
Hey, why not? It's only the most powerful, pund-for-pound, warship that Starfleet's ever devised - and a prototype initially at that! [/sarcasm]
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

The Defiant wasn't really misused. It was placed at the disposal of DS9's commander for which it was ideally suited. Small so as to not waste a big ship while not in use but powerful enough to fufill the missions that would undoubtably pop up in such a strange place. Also the fact that Sisko helped design it and that was pretty much its run down cruise it all worked pretty well.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Tsukiyumi
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 21747
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
Contact:

Post by Tsukiyumi »

Mikey wrote:Well, it is true that plans last until the first shot is fired
Nice paraphrase of Sun Tzu, Mikey.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

Thank you.

And the Defiant was assigned to DS9 well before there was a war; at which assignment is was primarily used as an oversized Danube. That is a ship that should have been assigned to a battlegroup, patrol mission, or even just as an extra escort to ships attempting "aggressive negotiations."
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Jim
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by Jim »

Mikey wrote:...at which assignment is was primarily used as an oversized Danube..
Eh, I think that is a bit of a stretch. I always thought it was put there as a bit of a warning. A "Don't tred on us" type thing. The DS9 area was rather hostile and I took the Defiant going there as a snake in the box. Almost like Dirty Harry standing there asking if he fired six or just five. Comitting a large ship would have been a waste of crew, but the Defiant packed the same power without the drain on resources.
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Post by Deepcrush »

I like the defiant in that starfleet got a ship right! Not since the Neb have we seen that! 7 years people! It only took starfleet 7 years to get it right!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
User avatar
Jim
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1907
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: Pittsburgh
Contact:

Post by Jim »

Deepcrush wrote:I like the defiant in that starfleet got a ship right! Not since the Neb have we seen that! 7 years people! It only took starfleet 7 years to get it right!
You do not like the Akira in that roll?
Ugh... do not thump the Book of G'Quan...
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Post by Sionnach Glic »

The Defiant is, by far, the smartest Starfleet design in service.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

The Defiant is to wasteful to be a good design.

Also as I said DS9 was its shake down crusie. You cant just throw it right into a battle group for that.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Post by Mikey »

DS9 was the its permanent post until its destruction. That's not a shakedown; that's an assignment.

After O'Brien et.al. fixed it, it should have been given a proper shakedown, and then an assignment that made sense.[/i]
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Post by Teaos »

DS9 needed a ship stationed there. Nothing makes more sense in that roll than a Defiant. Anythung bigger would be a waste and need to much crew. Any ship of similar or smaller size would not be powerful enough to do the missions needed.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Post Reply