Page 9 of 10

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:14 pm
by Lt. Staplic
:mrgreen:

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 8:08 pm
by Tsukiyumi
:lol:

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:42 pm
by Mark
That WAS a nice one. :happydevil:

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 10:51 pm
by Lt. Staplic
thank you, thank you,
I'll be here all week.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:42 am
by Reliant121
Mark wrote:At least I got to watch him squirm from something else. He was the PE teacher (because he was the only one that could still run on the teaching staff), the history, and science teacher (all sciences..........it was a SMALL school) so it fell to him also to teach health, and therefore the state mandated sex ed. Well, some of what he taught went above the state standard, covering such things the health and safety of swallowing, and how to properly lubricate the "backdoor". He got into a bit of trouble when parents found out how detailed his lessons could be. Still he didn't get fired though.
To be honest, I really dont see the problem with that. our Ex PDL teacher (personal development learning) taught us ALL the specifics about that, and I feel alot better now knowing all the knowledge i have.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:15 pm
by Lt. Staplic
big difference though. Mark was in an American Christian School...usually their sex-ed. includes all of the following:
"It's evil"
"If you do it, God will smite you where you stand and send you to hell"
"It is only to be used for procreation, after marrage"
and "There's only one orphase for that!"

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 3:18 pm
by Reliant121
Ah. That explains it then.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:22 am
by Aaron
Mark wrote:It was the way he did it, you know. And you have to consider the student body. A couple of people were so sheltered, the very CONCEPT of "backdoor" action was an entirely new concept. And it was creepy how he assured some of the young women that swallowing was less likely to spread STD's than unprotected vaginal sex.
*shrug* I always thought part of the purpose of school was to expose students to a wider world. Now that said, you don't have to be creepy about how you teach it.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:44 am
by stitch626
Lt. Staplic wrote:big difference though. Mark was in an American Christian School...usually their sex-ed. includes all of the following:
"It's evil"
"If you do it, God will smite you where you stand and send you to hell"
"It is only to be used for procreation, after marrage"
and "There's only one orphase for that!"
I would definitely argue with one and two. (I can't even figure where they came up with them :? )
And with part of three.
I won't get into four... no offense.

Oh, and its spelled orifice. :P

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:07 pm
by Lt. Staplic
thank you. I can't spell

and i never said i agree with it, i just said that's what they usually use.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:22 pm
by Mikey
Cpl Kendall wrote:*shrug* I always thought part of the purpose of school was to expose students to a wider world. Now that said, you don't have to be creepy about how you teach it.
Agreed on both counts. If I were a parent of a child in his class, I'd have much more of an issue with him making my kid uncomfortable about things, rather than with him just teaching about things that really do happen.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 7:42 pm
by Mark
Here here.

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:47 pm
by Lt. Staplic
kind of reminds me of this TV show where the dad was all worried b/c his kid was asking about sex and he wanted to have a real conversation with him, rather than what his father did, which was hand him a penthouse forum...he's still waiting for that bus full of cheerleaders :mrgreen:

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:55 pm
by Mark
My Two Dads

Re: Gay Rights

Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 11:03 pm
by Lt. Staplic
idk, was that it?