www.ditl.org

Isn't that how they make hot dogs?

Why are hot dogs called hot dogs?

Would you believe that this explains it fairly well?

Wiki, is there anything it doesnt know?

Is there anything it can be trusted on?

Doesnt it have enough "Truthiness" for you?

Given that it can be edited by any idiot and his brother, what do you think?

Didn't you know that they have to list their sources, and have quality control monitoring? Isn't it still more reliable than guessing, and considerably easier than searching hundreds of sites to maybe get some information?

Tsukiyumi wrote:Didn't you know that they have to list their sources, and have quality control monitoring?

And how regularly is this theory actually put into practice? What's stopping someone lying through their teeth about what a source says?

Isn't it still more reliable than guessing, and considerably easier than searching hundreds of sites to maybe get some information?

Wouldn't you rather have accuracy over ease of access?

Can you guarante the truth of any source?

Teaos wrote:Can you guarante the truth of any source?

Would you consider the accuracy of a piece of work that's been researched over months and credited to a named, identifiable individual, with a degree in the subject, to be greater or less that something that's been bashed out in five minutes by an anonymous nobody?

Considering the literally hundreds of people with PhD's out there who not only believe in God but in Creationisum will you forgive me for not trusting in a Degree to much?

Do you know that the sources have links at the bottom of each page?

Do you know that not all of those links are to reliable sources?

What would you define as a reliable source?