Page 8 of 15
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:36 pm
by Teaos
Oh joy another one on Rocheys side...
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:08 am
by colmquinn
I would imagine if the writers of TOS had the special effects and budget to play with we would've seen more examples of the coni having explosions and warp problems just like in TNG.
I know Scotty would've just climbed up a big drain pipe thingy and sorted it out with seconds to spare so maybe they just didn't bother spending the budget on ship models and spent it on the expensive sets
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:53 am
by Sionnach Glic
Oh joy another one on Rocheys side...
What's the matter, Teaos? Feeling outnumbered?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:32 pm
by Teaos
A little bit but I'm used to it
I do tend to get the odd ally on some topics but I do seem to be Starfleets number one defender around here... Maybe that should be my new title, the "Anti-Rochey" never really caught on.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:54 pm
by Mikey
colmquinn wrote:I would imagine if the writers of TOS had the special effects and budget to play with we would've seen more examples of the coni having explosions and warp problems just like in TNG.
Very possible, but as I've been reminded several times, we are essaying to find an in-universe explanation for the differences we saw. The SFX tech a/o budget of the show can't be allowed to affect the milieu that was shown. In the final analysis, it just seems that Starfleet was willing to build a ship that more closely resembled a warship "back in the day."
"Anti-Rochey" DOES have a nice ring to it...
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:58 pm
by Teaos
I personally like the idea that ships are a product of the times. Back then the Galaxy seemed more dangerous thus they had tuffer ships.
In TNG the Galaxy was more settled.
In Late DS9 things were not so calm and thus we are getting more combat ships once more.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 1:59 pm
by Mikey
I know you're not used to hearing this from many of us, Teaos, but:
That makes absolutely perfect sense and I agree 100%.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:05 pm
by Teaos
If you don't hear from me again its because I killed my self knowing that this moment can not be topped.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:46 pm
by Sionnach Glic
You might want to sit down for this, Teaos, but I also think that that makes perfect sense.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:44 pm
by kostmayer
To me too. Which begs the question what the next generation of ships will be like.
Will Starfleet construct a more battle orientated fleet incase another major war occurs, or will they go back to having mostly Science and Exploration ships.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 5:00 pm
by Sionnach Glic
They'll probably go back to the way they were, it's the Starfleet thing to do.
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:29 pm
by Jordanis
Yeah, they probably will go back. They're such a big pile of optimists. (And I agree with Teaos' product of their times bit too)
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:33 pm
by Captain Picard's Hair
The TOS era was like a "wild west" period for the Federation compared to TNG - what Picard calls "cowboy diplomacy" in Unification
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:22 am
by Teaos
I think we might be starting to see a split finally.
The Akira, promethius, Defiant and to a lesser extent the Sov are all combat ships while the Galaxy and Nova really do seem more science like.
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:52 am
by Mikey
Now, if we could just get Starfleet to use vessels the way they're intended...