Page 8 of 10
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:22 pm
by stitch626
In a public school he would have been fired right away.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 3:01 pm
by Lt. Staplic
he should have been fired over here too.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:10 pm
by Mark
Well, my word against his, and he didn't really need to PROVE I said or did anything to slap me with detention. T'was a bummer, but an important life lesson.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:30 pm
by Mikey
stitch626 wrote:In a public school he would have been fired right away.
True. In some states, teachers in parochial schools don't even need to have teaching certifications. For example, many Catholic schools have nuns as teachers simply by the fact that they are nuns, and have no teaching credentials.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:53 pm
by Mark
At least I got to watch him squirm from something else. He was the PE teacher (because he was the only one that could still run on the teaching staff), the history, and science teacher (all sciences..........it was a SMALL school) so it fell to him also to teach health, and therefore the state mandated sex ed. Well, some of what he taught went above the state standard, covering such things the health and safety of swallowing, and how to properly lubricate the "backdoor". He got into a bit of trouble when parents found out how detailed his lessons could be. Still he didn't get fired though.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:51 pm
by Lt. Staplic
wow, what a perv.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:27 am
by Mark
His justification was providing a broad ranging education
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:28 am
by Sonic Glitch
Mark wrote:His justification was providing a broad ranging education
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:34 am
by Mark
I felt much the same way
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:49 am
by Aaron
Mark wrote:At least I got to watch him squirm from something else. He was the PE teacher (because he was the only one that could still run on the teaching staff), the history, and science teacher (all sciences..........it was a SMALL school) so it fell to him also to teach health, and therefore the state mandated sex ed. Well, some of what he taught went above the state standard, covering such things the health and safety of swallowing, and how to properly lubricate the "backdoor". He got into a bit of trouble when parents found out how detailed his lessons could be. Still he didn't get fired though.
I actually don't have a problem with any of that. You've got to learn it somewhere and better a school than trial and error.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 1:56 am
by Mark
It was the way he did it, you know. And you have to consider the student body. A couple of people were so sheltered, the very CONCEPT of "backdoor" action was an entirely new concept. And it was creepy how he assured some of the young women that swallowing was less likely to spread STD's than unprotected vaginal sex.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 2:20 am
by Lt. Staplic
well duh, it's the miracle of hydrochloric acid
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:03 pm
by Mikey
Weird. I would have figured that the Christian-school curriculum for sex-ed comprised, "Don't or G-d will kill you."
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:10 pm
by Lt. Staplic
well, state laws say you have to teach x amount of material, but he crossed into x rated material there.
Re: Gay Rights
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:12 pm
by Mikey