Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

The Next Generation
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Mikey »

Yar and Work were both security, and they both manned tactical.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Mark »

Mark wrote:
Bryan Moore wrote:
Mikey wrote:Tactical seems to be attached to security.
Then I would want more than 36 security personel. I understand others have cross-training, but automation or not, you're going to want people manning various equipment related to the defensive systems in a fight.
I had assumed that operations would actually man tactacal during a situation, with engineering doing maintence on those systems, with security's assistance. Are there actually desingnated Tactical Personel?
I was referring to the ACTUAL tactical locations, like the torpedeo loading bay, and the phaser control rooms to moniter the equipment in battle.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
User avatar
Bryan Moore
Captain
Captain
Posts: 2730
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
Contact:

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Bryan Moore »

Mark wrote:I was referring to the ACTUAL tactical locations, like the torpedeo loading bay, and the phaser control rooms to moniter the equipment in battle.
Well this is what I was going for. There's gotta be a lot of tactical equipment. Torpedos, phasers, deflectors, shields. And I would think you'd want at least one person near the battle bridge just in case you need a quick separation.
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Mark »

Bryan Moore wrote:
Mark wrote:I was referring to the ACTUAL tactical locations, like the torpedeo loading bay, and the phaser control rooms to moniter the equipment in battle.
Well this is what I was going for. There's gotta be a lot of tactical equipment. Torpedos, phasers, deflectors, shields. And I would think you'd want at least one person near the battle bridge just in case you need a quick separation.
Well, during an alert situation I'd figue there would be a surplus of people around, because everybody would their designated "battlestation". All off duty personel would be on duty, and thus manning all of those other areas that wouldn't really need somebody all of the time. My figures were for an ordinary day of curising along. Figuring battlestations would require alot more effort
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Aaron »

Bryan Moore wrote: Well this is what I was going for. There's gotta be a lot of tactical equipment. Torpedos, phasers, deflectors, shields. And I would think you'd want at least one person near the battle bridge just in case you need a quick separation.
Lets be honest, in combat the battle bridge should be fully manned with the XO on station. What with the main bridge sticking up on top like a nipple, it only makes sense to have a manned backup.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Teaos »

The battle birdge was a good idea, shame it wasnt the main bridge.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Sionnach Glic »

Agreed. One of Starfleet's stupider moves.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by JudgeKing »

Here is Ent-D staffing breakdown

Capt. Jean-Luc Picard
Capt. Edward Jellico
Commander William T. Riker
Commander Elizabeth Shelby
Lt. Commander Data
Lt. Commander Geordie La Forge
Lt. Worf
Lt. Reginald Barclay
Lt. Natasha Yar
Lt. Armstrong
Ensign Sito Jaxa
Ensign Simon Tarses
Dr. Beverly Crusher
Counselor Deanna Troi
Nurse Alyssa Ogawa
Ensign Ro Laren (renegade)
Ensign Wesley Crusher (deceased)
Chief O'Brien

Everyone else is nameless cannonfodder.
Last edited by JudgeKing on Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Teaos »

Weslet isnt decessed, you left out O'Brien and if your putting in dead people what about Yar? You also left out Barclay and many other characters we saw a bit of.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by JudgeKing »

JudgeKing wrote:Here is Ent-D staffing breakdown

Capt. Jean-Luc Picard
Capt. Edward Jellico
Commander William T. Riker
Commander Elizabeth Shelby
Lt. Commander Data
Lt. Commander Geordie La Forge
Lt. Worf
Lt. Reginald Barclay
Lt. Natasha Yar
Lt. Armstrong
Ensign Sito Jaxa
Ensign Simon Tarses
Dr. Beverly Crusher
Counselor Deanna Troi
Nurse Alyssa Ogawa
Ensign Ro Laren (renegade)
Ensign Wesley Crusher (deceased)
Chief O'Brien

Everyone else is nameless cannonfodder.
There updated.
Weslet isnt decessed, you left out O'Brien and if your putting in dead people what about Yar? You also left out Barclay and many other characters we saw a bit of.
Sorry, there is no one named Welset in TNG.
Last edited by JudgeKing on Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
User avatar
Teaos
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15380
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: Behind you!

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Teaos »

The fact that we saw him in Nemises would imply he's either alive or that SF is employing corpes nowadays.
What does defeat mean to you?

Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
JudgeKing
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 5:53 am
Location: Somewhere in the universe

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by JudgeKing »

Teaos wrote:The fact that we saw him in Nemises would imply he's either alive or that SF is employing corpes nowadays.
Either could be true.

1) Either he's alive.

2) Likely since Starfleet is made of drooling vegetables.
There is not a problem in this world that can't be solved without the proper application of a sufficient number of thermonuclear ordnance.
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Mark »

Here's one for you. During a Red Alert, everybody reports to their battlestations. Where do the civilians go? Each to there own quarters which would spread them out somewhat or to emergency locations deep inside the hull for maximum protection? Or would even certain civilians (meaning the able bodies adults) have certain designated battlestations?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Sionnach Glic
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 26014
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Sionnach Glic »

I imagine they're just told to go to their quarters and stay out of the way unless told otherwise.
"You've all been selected for this mission because you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day-Lewis! Welcome to Operation MindFuck!"
Mark
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 17671
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:49 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: Enterprise D - Staffing Breakdown

Post by Mark »

Rochey wrote:I imagine they're just told to go to their quarters and stay out of the way unless told otherwise.

But would that be a smart move, considering most of the quarters we've seen APPEAR to be near the outside of the hull (basing that on the windows)? A hull breach could wipe out several families. Not saying that your wrong, because I've always assumed the same thing, but wouldn't that be kind of unwise?
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
Post Reply