What if 2

JudgeKing · Post by **JudgeKing** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:04 pm

Were Enterprise seasons 1 and 2 Star trek?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:09 pm

Technicaly, it doesn't have "Star Trek" in the name.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:57 pm

Rochey wrote:Don't forget the whole idea of multi-purpose ships.

So, here's the list as of now:
8472's intentions.
Civillians on ships: good idea or bad?
MVAM: useful or waste of space?
Borg KE shields.
Starfleet: soldiers or scientists?
Jack-of-all-trades ships.

Hey, are you guys serious? There are forbidden topics around here?

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:59 pm

Not "forbidden", per se, only things we've tried to discuss that always end up going around in circles. I don't have any problem re-debating them; this time I've already got my argument prepared.

Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:45 am

Let's pretend they're forbidden. Just now, one of them got one person warned and another suspended. After enough inconclusive debating, things get personal and then turn into flaming. Let sleeping targs lie.

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:46 am

Yeah, targs arn't nice when their happy, hate to see one when its angry.

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:56 am

Mikey wrote:Let's pretend they're forbidden. Just now, one of them got one person warned and another suspended. After enough inconclusive debating, things get personal and then turn into flaming. Let sleeping targs lie.

That argument popped back up for all of maybe fifteen posts, and then the primary involved parties started tossing around insults; something that happens with regularity regarding certain people. The particular topic wasn't what spawned the problem; the people involved acting like f*cking assh*les is what caused it.

Seems to be a bit of that going around lately.

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 1:58 am

Not with me though.

Honestly though, I was affected, and I tried to keep things under control. Well, we saw how that worked out.

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:06 am

stitch626 wrote:Not with me though.
Honestly though, I was affected, and I tried to keep things under control. Well, we saw how that worked out.

At least you tried. See my "The Insult Thread" for my attempt. Fat lot of good it did.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:07 am

Honestly, I think it sucks when things have to get to a personal level. Ruins the whole topic discussion for everybody. I love a good Trek debate, becuase it sparks new ideas and points of view I never would have considered before, and some of those topics are some of my favorite discussion points, but I don't want to start any trouble either.

No offense to the combatants

stitch626 · Post by **stitch626** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:10 am

I enjoyed your insult thread Tsu. It was a good idea. Maybe we should have an innuendo thread so that it doesn't clog all of the others... wait, bad idea.

Post by **Tsukiyumi** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:17 am

stitch626 wrote:I enjoyed your insult thread Tsu. It was a good idea. Maybe we should have an innuendo thread so that it doesn't clog all of the others... wait, bad idea.

I'm pretty sure I tried that one, too.

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:47 am

Wait....maybe we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss it. We could call it the Batleth ring or something, and let folks duel with their wits till their hearts are content

Post by **Teaos** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:10 am

Your free to debate them if you have omething you consider a new point and are willing to put up with us vets rehashing old points. Most of us can debate nicely. I would go look at the old topics though and see if you really do have something to add.

Post by **Mikey** » Thu Jul 24, 2008 5:08 am

Tsukiyumi wrote:
stitch626 wrote:Not with me though.
Honestly though, I was affected, and I tried to keep things under control. Well, we saw how that worked out.
At least you tried. See my "The Insult Thread" for my attempt. Fat lot of good it did.

Well, that was because we TR-116'd the insult thread.

What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2

Re: What if 2