Teaos wrote:The amazing speech he gave at the founding of the Federation... oh wait, there was no speech.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Teaos wrote:The amazing speech he gave at the founding of the Federation... oh wait, there was no speech.
Corrected that for youMikey wrote:Yes, I think he was only the captain on ENT.Monroe wrote:Being the Captain on the best Trek show? >.>Rochey wrote:He had a great moment?
But we're not discussing TOS.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Corrected that for youMikey wrote:Yes, I think he was only the captain on ENT.
Good cause otherwise we'd have a bad captain.Mikey wrote:But we're not discussing TOS.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Corrected that for youMikey wrote:Yes, I think he was only the captain on ENT.
Now we're talking about VOY? Will you guys please quit changing the topic?Monroe wrote:Good cause otherwise we'd have a bad captain.
That's what I like, he's not perfect. Picard was all high and might and knew everything and whatnot. Archer show that he's just as human as we are.Rochey wrote:The problem was that he was so freaking inconsistant in his decisions.
For example, in Fortunate Son Archer goes all-out to stop a freighter captain from getting revenge on a band of pirates who had attacked him on numerous occasions and killed his son.
Yet in a later episode, Archer does the very same thing himself and goes after a group to get revenge on them for something or other.
I don't remember that episode. And didn't Picard do something like that with the Prime Directive until other members of his crew convinced him to do otherwise?Rochey wrote:No, Archer shows that he's freaking inconsistant. Someone who was "just as human as we are" wouldn't stand by and let billions die when he had the cure in his hand due to some seriously ******-up "logic".