To the peyote mobile!Mikey wrote:I don't think there are any Mexicans left in Mexico. It's perfect timing - the agave fields are unguarded!Teaos wrote:He wouldnt want Mexicao. To many Mexicans funnily enough.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
To the peyote mobile!Mikey wrote:I don't think there are any Mexicans left in Mexico. It's perfect timing - the agave fields are unguarded!Teaos wrote:He wouldnt want Mexicao. To many Mexicans funnily enough.
Oh yes, absolutely they do. This same news article is a topic thread on another forum (non-Trek) that I've been haunting lately. (Sorry, I have been cheating on you all.) And you should see some of the immediate kneejerk rejections of the idea that global warming could possibly be taken seriously by anyone with a brain that are out there. People are really indoctrinated that it's not real... cause you know... the fossil fuel industries and automotive industries say so. Well, some of them still do, anyway. And we all know the have the best interests of the human race, the ecosystem, and the planet at heart, naturally.Rochey wrote:And people still deny global warming is realy.
A fair number of the deniers in the US are of the religious nutjob variety, they think the rapture will claim them before anything bad happens. Of course it was supposed to happen 1900+ years ago (depending on how long jeebus lived) so that's out the window.Teaos wrote:But even if it is natral dont they realise it will screw us anyway?
When you boil it down in any argument, there's always a segment of lunatics at either end that ruin it. Look at PETA, they took the SPCA's platform and have set an impossible goal.Mikey wrote:The fact is that there are knee-jerk reactions among the "green" crowd, too - people who scream that carbon dioxide is the worst thing in the world and that it's taking over our atmosphere when it still makes up less than 1% and when carbon monoxide, methane, etc., are all worse for the atmosphere; the same people who once told me (who am already all for legislation for cleaner industry, etc.) that ozone, once lost, will never be able to be recovered. That particular Sierra Club member was a bit crestfallen when I told her that she was probably right, the only way to recover any ozone would be the hugely unlikely event of ever having lightning. Unfortunately, when these people speak, it obscures the message of the environmental advocates who actually know what they're talking about.
As it stands, though, Teaos has the right of it - it really matters little to the deceased if he died of natural or artificial causes.
And have attached the stigma of lunacy to the animal rights movement. As we discussed about mainstream Christianity - the looniest ones are often the loudest ones.Cpl Kendall wrote:When you boil it down in any argument, there's always a segment of lunatics at either end that ruin it. Look at PETA, they took the SPCA's platform and have set an impossible goal.
No, they are actual evil in theory... it's just in execution that they become Evil Lite.Rochey wrote:Pfft. PETA are just wannabe evil. The Diet Coke, if you will, of evil.
Seems like every time I turn around, they're doing another naked protest.Mikey wrote:PETA's naked?