Who said it wasn't. Kindly do not blame soldiers for the failure of international diplomacy, we are not allowed to disobey an order unless it is illegal or unethical. There's nothing in the QR&O's or UCMJ about wars started by retard monkey's.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Well, I believe in talking things over first. Killing another human being should be an absolute last resort.
Gay marriage arguments
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
I don't blame soldiers for the failure of international diplomacy, I blame them for volunteering to kill people. Canada's military is still voluntary I assume.Cpl Kendall wrote:Who said it wasn't. Kindly do not blame soldiers for the failure of international diplomacy, we are not allowed to disobey an order unless it is illegal or unethical. There's nothing in the QR&O's or UCMJ about wars started by retard monkey's.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Well, I believe in talking things over first. Killing another human being should be an absolute last resort.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Yes and it's with the implied contract that we not be used for BS conflicts, hence why we're not in Iraq.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
I don't blame soldiers for the failure of international diplomacy, I blame them for volunteering to kill people. Canada's military is still voluntary I assume.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Don't change the subject. But you admit that you volunteered to kill people. No one forced you to volunteer.Cpl Kendall wrote:Yes and it's with the implied contract that we not be used for BS conflicts, hence why we're not in Iraq.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
I don't blame soldiers for the failure of international diplomacy, I blame them for volunteering to kill people. Canada's military is still voluntary I assume.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
People who threaten the country, don't pretend you can't see the distinction.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Don't change the subject. But you admit that you volunteered to kill people. No one forced you to volunteer.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
When was the last time someone invaded Canada? Or the US for that matter. Besides, there's nothing that can't be done if you're willing to negotiate.Cpl Kendall wrote:People who threaten the country, don't pretend you can't see the distinction.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Don't change the subject. But you admit that you volunteered to kill people. No one forced you to volunteer.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Don't pretend there aren't legitimate reasons for a country like Canada to have a military. Reason one is that our neighbor is extremely dangerous, reason two is disaster assistance, reason three is search and rescue, reason four is anti-terrorism.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
When was the last time someone invaded Canada? Or the US for that matter. Besides, there's nothing that can't be done if you're willing to negotiate.
As for negotiation, tell that to Kuwait.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
You're closest neighbor is the US and last time I checked we were allies. And, I honestly don't think anyone's going to invade Canada.Cpl Kendall wrote:Reason one is that our neighbor is extremely dangerous,
Aren't there civilian agencys for that? And do you really need guns to help you with that?reason two is disaster assistance,
Once again, what about civilian agencys?reason three is search and rescue,
reason four is anti-terrorism.
I might give you that, since some terrorists can be unreasonable.
I would but I don't have their number.As for negotiation, tell that to Kuwait.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
You won't be saying that when oil gets scarcer and the US starts to dry up thanks to global warming.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
You're closest neighbor is the US and last time I checked we were allies. And, I honestly don't think anyone's going to invade Canada.
How many civvie agencies have twenty thousand trained personnel that can be deployed anywhere in Canada within 24 hours? And yes it helps to bring weapons, during the 1998 Ontario/Quebec icestorm there were looters.
Aren't there civilian agencys for that? And do you really need guns to help you with that?
Because the CF was tasked with it by the Federal Government. How many agencies can operate in the high arctic?
Once again, what about civilian agencys?
Some?
I might give you that, since some terrorists can be unreasonable.
1-800-Curb-Stomp.
I would but I don't have their number.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
"Some terrorists can be unreasonable"? Yeah, I'd say blowing up children ON PURPOSE is always unreasonable. Kuwait had tried to negotiate, as did most of Europe before WW2. What do you do when your enemy doesn't feel like negotiating? If someone walked up to you for no reason and hit you in the face repeatedly, would you stand there and try to "talk" them out of it? Better yet, if someone pulled a knife on you, and you were cornered, you'd try to talk to them then?
Stay at home as much as you can, Blackstar. If any real crisis situation ever breaks out in front of you, you'll either get killed, or get other people killed with such a naive attitude and lack of real experiance.
Stay at home as much as you can, Blackstar. If any real crisis situation ever breaks out in front of you, you'll either get killed, or get other people killed with such a naive attitude and lack of real experiance.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Well, aren't you clever?1-800-Curb-Stomp
How did all this start? Oh, yes. I remember now, I was trying to explain to you why some people, and more specifically why I don't like soldiers. So I'm curious, do you understand my reasoning now? At all?
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
No, I don't. I understand the objections to murder, yes. Not military action, from where I sit this attitude is cowardice. There's no reason to look for a fight and you should do everything you can do avoid it but there comes a point where it has to be done.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Well, aren't you clever?
How did all this start? Oh, yes. I remember now, I was trying to explain to you why some people, and more specifically why I don't like soldiers. So I'm curious, do you understand my reasoning now? At all?
Your actually the exact type of person I was trying to describe. Dislike the military but when something happens they scream for us. I'm looking at you Quebec.
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 21747
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:38 pm
- Location: Forward Torpedo Tube Twenty. Help!
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
I sure don't. If we had no soldiers, you think the rest of the world would either disarm, or just leave us alone? That's about as probable as me walking outside and flying away like Superman.ChakatBlackstar wrote:Well, aren't you clever?1-800-Curb-Stomp
How did all this start? Oh, yes. I remember now, I was trying to explain to you why some people, and more specifically why I don't like soldiers. So I'm curious, do you understand my reasoning now? At all?
If you don't care to defend yourself, that's fine with me, but suggesting that I can't, or condemning people who protect all of us at grave personal risk is, quite frankly, rather offensive, and naive bullsh*t.
There is only one way of avoiding the war – that is the overthrow of this society. However, as we are too weak for this task, the war is inevitable. -L. Trotsky, 1939
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Is it any less cowardly to hide behind a gun?Cpl Kendall wrote:
No, I don't. I understand the objections to murder, yes. Not military action, from where I sit this attitude is cowardice.
Purhaps not right away. But a gradual disarmament might help make the world a little more peaceful. But peace has to start somewhere, and it's not going to be by killing.I sure don't. If we had no soldiers, you think the rest of the world would either disarm, or just leave us alone
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Gay marriage arguments
Using a weapon against people that are using them against you is hardly hiding. The job of the military is to kill people in a quick and efficent matter with as little loss to your side as possible.ChakatBlackstar wrote:
Is it any less cowardly to hide behind a gun?
Ok, who disarms first then?
Purhaps not right away. But a gradual disarmament might help make the world a little more peaceful. But peace has to start somewhere, and it's not going to be by killing.