What would you fix on the E-D?
- Teaos
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15380
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 4:00 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: Behind you!
April fools day would be great on that ship. The transporter room beams the ships "Waste" into the bridge.
What does defeat mean to you?
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
Nothing it will never come. Death before defeat. I don’t bend or break. I end, if I meet a foe capable of it. Victory is in forcing the opponent to back down. I do not. There is no defeat.
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:05 pm
On that note, I remember a similar conversation on another forum once. There it was suggested that there were no bathrooms, whenever a person had to go, the ship's computer would detect it, beam the waste out of them and convert it to energy which was used in the replicator systems. This is also why everyone complains that replicated isn't as good as actual food.
Putting the manatee back in humanity.
- Bryan Moore
- Captain
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:39 am
- Location: Perpetual Summer Camp
- Contact:
Site-to-site transport wasn't even done that frequently baring security situations on any of the 24th century shows.
As for the lavatories, I believe the original Technical , Manual mentioned them in it but that's just about it. I guess it was never something that was overly considered. Honestly, I think the TOS sound effect for a flushing toilet would be great.
As for the lavatories, I believe the original Technical , Manual mentioned them in it but that's just about it. I guess it was never something that was overly considered. Honestly, I think the TOS sound effect for a flushing toilet would be great.
Don't you hear my call, though you're many years away, don't you hear me calling you?
-
- Banned
- Posts: 5594
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:53 pm
I know that was an older post but I'd like to point out that the Borg have the same thinking. Look how they turned out.Teaos wrote: By being one big computer it can achive results better than many smaller ones.
Also, I think the reason why people want the Holodeck fixed over the safer Warp Core is that the warp core is a high energy reactor using very volatile materials for energy. Holodecks on the other hand are supposed to be common forms of entertainment. There is no way a common form of entertainment should be that deadly after ever malfunction. Every time something goes wrong with your TV does it do anything dangerous? Maybe once in a thousand incidents, and that's usually from user error.
Now if they made other systems more redundant that would be great. There should be no way that a virus or anything else should be able to disable/take over the ship's computer. I've never heard of anything like that on any ship in real life, civilian or military.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
It isn't that the holodecks and computers aren't major problems - they are. The problem is that if the holodeck goes haywire it's only those in it that get killed. If the warp goes goes up everyone dies. To a great extent the warp core and computer problems are linked, since the Feds rely on the computer to control their safety systems. If the warp core was designed propery it wouldn't matter what went wrong with the computer - failure of containment should result in the core being ejected regardless of what the computer did or didn't do.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- Senior chief petty officer
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 12:08 pm
- Location: Deck One, Bridge
Can't help it
Well, the Enterprise D HAD to be sacrificed in the name of advancing the plot in the movies, but the way they did it was rather unfitting. Perhaps making the Duras sisters steal a Nebula class starship and then fighting the Enterprise would be better...
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
-
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 26014
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:58 pm
- Location: Poblacht na hÉireann, Baile Átha Cliath
-
- Ensign
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:56 pm
- Location: A little village in Austria
Re: What would you fix on the E-D?
Well, as I wrote elsewhere, I think that the biggest problem on the Enterprise D were not the constructors, not the designers but the writers who wanted things on board to blow up every now and then. Also computer breakdowns and (threat of) a warp core breach was quite popular. But the problem was, that the ship was too strong in concept: It had three seperate computer cores who should have worked individually. It had several redundancies to every system (Data stated it once, I think to remember). It had escape pods near the crew quarters. It had a system to evacuate the civilians and non essential crew but that Picard hardly used it is the fault of the writers.
Got the point? I still think that the Galaxy-Class starship has a wonderful design and a beautiful philosophie behind it!
(And yes, you might have noticed that I do not watch Star Trek to see stories about a military service but of explorers who "boldly go, where no man has gone before" (I know, that was a little solemn). I do not think that I would have watched and enjoyed it as much, if we would have seen constant "Elite Force").
Got the point? I still think that the Galaxy-Class starship has a wonderful design and a beautiful philosophie behind it!
(And yes, you might have noticed that I do not watch Star Trek to see stories about a military service but of explorers who "boldly go, where no man has gone before" (I know, that was a little solemn). I do not think that I would have watched and enjoyed it as much, if we would have seen constant "Elite Force").
Re: What would you fix on the E-D?
The GCS isn't a design to be sneezed at. But, as a class it's already phasing out. I don't believe they are even building them anymore, in favor of the Soverign, Nova, and Prommie classes. I could be wrong though. The ones still in service will most likely see long years of use.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: What would you fix on the E-D?
I'd like to know why we don't have an "All the above" vote on here.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Re: What would you fix on the E-D?
They DID fix all of the above. They built the Soverign class.
They say that in the Army,
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
the women are mighty fine.
They look like Phyllis Diller,
and walk like Frankenstein.
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: What would you fix on the E-D?
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu