YAY!!!!!Of all the dealerships we service, the Porsche's are the most reliable servicewise.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64621/64621aaa9c4209b4aaaff49a000f03bb1043ad02" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
YAY!!!!!Of all the dealerships we service, the Porsche's are the most reliable servicewise.
It's not slander, because you technically can't post-date a check. I'd say the contractor is more the problem than the bank - if he deposited the check, then the bank doesn't really have recourse but to process it. If, however, he gave you his word as a man that he would sit on it - a/o never said it would be a problem when you gave it to him and told him it was for today - then he's a dick, pure and simple.Tsukiyumi wrote:What the f*ck? That's the whole point of post-dating a check. I haven't had a bank account in ten years, and even I know that.
"Fraud", my ass. Get him on tape saying that, then sue the f*cker for slander.
I've never heard that. I know my parents and grandparents did it all the time, but perhaps the rules have changed since the 80's.Mikey wrote:It's not slander, because you technically can't post-date a check.
Yes they do. "We're sorry but we can't cash this check, the date is irregular."It's not slander, because you technically can't post-date a check. I'd say the contractor is more the problem than the bank - if he deposited the check, then the bank doesn't really have recourse but to process it.
Yeah, it's moe a question of the contractor pulling a dick move in a situation in which most of us would act like humans. Everybody does it all the time; it's just a case of getting caught up in the bank because the contractor went back on his word.Tsukiyumi wrote:EDIT: Just checked the UCC, and it appears you're right. I guess people just had some common f*cking decency back then.
Certainly. The point is that 99.99% of the blame here should fall on your contractor rather than the bank. The $50 hold thing is completely out of bounds, though. I don't see how you can consider money drafted that hasn't been drafted yet.Tyyr wrote:Yes they do. "We're sorry but we can't cash this check, the date is irregular."
This just happened to me with Wachovia, charged me overdraft fees on 3 'on hold' charges. I also have a Chase account, they haven't charged me for any 'pending' overdrafts.Tyyr wrote:I told her, "You work for ME. You are my bank with my money. If a check says its not to be cashed until the 26th, you'd damn well better not cash it on the 25th!" Banking laws my f***ing ass. If its not kosher then they shouldn't accept the check period, not just cash it anyways. Should have asked her if there's anything else on the check they just ignore for the hell of it like maybe the amount.
They're gone though, they've done this before and I've fought them off most of the time. Like the last overdraft. I got gas and paid via debit right? Well I only put in like $20. The next day I was getting paid. I check, overdraft. Why? Because the gas station put a hold on my account, not a charge, just a hold, for $50. So no one actually took more money out of my account than I had, they just had a hold on it. I went off on the person I talked to about it.
I got an over draft fee because I "might" have overdrafted?
Yes.
But at no point did I actually overdraft my account.
Well no but there was a ho...
Ok, so you just said I never actually overdrafted my account you're just charging me because it theoretically could have been?
Well I didn't say that...
Lemme talk to your supervisor.
I got that $105 back but I promised myself the next time they tried this bullshit I was gone. Well they did, and I'm gone.
Yes they do. "We're sorry but we can't cash this check, the date is irregular."It's not slander, because you technically can't post-date a check. I'd say the contractor is more the problem than the bank - if he deposited the check, then the bank doesn't really have recourse but to process it.