What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

The Original Series
Locked
User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by DSG2k »

Tholian_Avenger wrote:
SuperSaiyaMan12 wrote:You know, what are the other ships that they use besides the Connies back then? They have to control thousands of light years of space after all.
Well to answer this in disregard for the several pages of debate about non-canon things, and to verily raise from the dead a horse that was not beat enough--the Oberth and Miranda are reported to be the eldest of designs viewed in TNG and DS9 and those two were seen in droves. Next in line would be the Excelsior.

To my knowledge, no Constitution class Star Ship was ever shown in either series (except for time travel). Since we also know from TOS that there were very few Constitutions about the obvious answer is that the Constitution was an endurance jogging scientist, with a Slim Pickens sprinter alter ego. Which is to say that Constitutions were kept on the borders and frontiers, and in the event of war were expected to dash into the enemy territory and visit strategic devastation upon them, knowing full well it was a one way trip to prepare time for the rest of the fleet. Recollect, if you will, the period in which this Television Show was conceived and it makes sense. (I guess the USS Me was a Connie?) Recollect, if you will again, that a certain NCC-1701 had a certain ease and natural quality about her dash raid into the Romulan Empire.

Considering that there exists a certain design similarity between the Miranda and Constitution-TMP, and to some extent one can envision this ethos in the Oberth, I feel confident in asserting that a Miranda TOS form was around defending the interior from war and natural disaster, while an Oberth TOS form fleet was also present bringing the mundane cargo, wares, and missions to their destinations. Obviously, then, the actual displayed Oberths and Mirandas certainly functioned that way during the "movie years".

The Excelsior must then be a realization by SF that it was spread to thin and that a resurgent Romulan Empire (with other undiscovered threats) needed a large cruiser force, not merely a blitzkrieg raider + angry cow herd. Certainly there seems to be a recurring pacifist and hawk element in SF's internal discourse. I think the immediate aftermath of the Excelsior build up constitutes the appeasement to the Cardassian menace and others in which Jean Luc Picard's command of the Stargazer featured so dimly. This era of mellow feelings resulted in the (few in number) grandiose Galaxy class which were intended to regally criss cross the Federation when needed and deal with the unwashed mass of frontiersmen when so called upon.
I wouldn't go so far as some of the places you go, but your theories are in general roughly compatible with my own. Though building a huge ship like the Excelsior on the grounds of being spread too thin is odd . . . they could've built four Mirandas for that one ship, by volume.

But I concur, for instance, that the political instability of the 2350s probably resulted in the Galaxy Class, finally topping the aged Ambassador Class that had appeared around the time of the last known conflict the Federation took part in for almost fifty years, up to the 2350s. But regarding TOS:

Volumetrically, for instance, the Constitution and Miranda are nearly identical, and by registry info I consider the Miranda to be the newer of the two designs by a few decades.

The Constitution design, to my mind, was 50 years old by the time of TOS, originating sometime circa 2210. She would've been a fairly impressive ship for the Starfleet, being 67% larger in volume than the older Daedalus Class. Kirk noted that there were a dozen Constitutions in service in the 2260's, and with at least seven of these having built in the 2240's (Intrepid 1631, Excalibur 1664, Exeter 1672, NCC-1700, Enterprise 1701 (2245), Lexington 1709, Defiant 1764) I would argue that the early Constitution probably was considered a large and fast vessel, and the presumably-modernized 2240's version was still an excellent starship. But the design was showing its age, perhaps especially compared to the compact and capable Mirandas (better armed with torpedo rollbar or perhaps able to accept mission-specific pods like the Nebula) that were deployed circa the mid-2250s.

By the 2280s, the Excelsior and Constellation class ships were in service, both of which are over three times larger than the Constitutions (the Excelsior is four times larger). And, as soon as TMP there was already the USS Entente NCC 2120, referred to as a dreadnought, a term never used for Constitution Class starships. (That ship could even be of the Constellation Class, since I rather favor the idea that it originated circa 2270 rather than in the late 2280's as the earliest known registry suggests (certainly it cannot have appeared prior to the destruction of the USS Constellation in the mid-2260's).)

Given that the Constitutions did not apparently exist in massive numbers even after the 2240's constructions, and given the existence of diagrams of Hermes/Saladin and Ptolemy Class ships (which may or may not've been tugs, or indeed might've been simply TOS-styled Mirandas or proto-Mirandas depending on how far we want to take the resolution of the Star Trek II screens), those ships must've constituted a high percentage of the fleet.

During the TOS era, then, I would posit at least the following classes:

- (Unknown New Large Dreadnought, Possibly Constellation)
- Constitution Class (12)
- Miranda Class (probably being built in good numbers)
- Ptolemy Class (as proto-Miranda, fairly numerous)
- Saladin/Hermes Class (quite numerous)
- Oberth Class (reasonably numerous)
- Unknown others (probably quite a number of other small classes given the Federation class-happiness of the 24th Century)

Assuming a DS9-era fleet of 8-12 thousand ships, I can't imagine a Federation starfleet during the height of the Klingon Cold War with less than a thousand ships. So to have only a dozen Constitutions implies that other classes made up the vast bulk of the fleet, however famous the Consitutions were.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by stitch626 »

Do remember the remains of a Constitution was seen in the fleet of Wolf 359.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Mikey »

Makes sense... the only issue I have with that TOS-era composition is that Constellation and Oberth have components which visually don't appear to be in common with the other ships, which seem to share a style (of saucer bezel, of acelle, etc.) It certainly doesn't rule anything out, but it is odd that a number of ships share certain design aesthetics and just a couple have anachronistic-looking components.

Also, I don't believe the TOS-style Miranda is canon... didn't we just see that in the Joseph TM? If so, then that would fall under the above as well, or be relegated to the movie-era.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Vic
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: Springfield MO

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Vic »

No Franz Joseph did not have a TOS style Miranda. Only the single nacelle ships and the proposed dreadnaught along with the Connies. I'm not sure who came up with the supposed TOS Miranda design.



P.S. Forgot about the tugs in FJ Tech Manual, this may be what you were thinking about Mikey.
God is great, beer is good, and people are crazy.
.................................................Billy Currington
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Tyyr »

Well when you look at the Miranda made of refit Connie parts its not a huge leap to imagine a Miranda made out of pre-refit Connie parts.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Captain Seafort »

True, however based on the fact that the Miranda was still in widespread service ninety years later, while the Connie has only a single sighting of what could well have been a mothballed ship scrambled for the emergency, it was probably a lot newer than the Connie, and therefore the configuration in TWoK et al was probably the original design.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Tyyr »

Possibly, but how old is the idea? Again, I can see someone watching TWoK in theaters and coming up with the idea. Also, its possible that for reasons you just don't see in the show the Mirandas were more attractive to keep around than the Connies. Maybe the Connies were a bitch to keep running but the Miranda's weren't. Maybe the space frame was easier to modify than the Connie. There are potential reasons for the Mirandas to hang around when the Connies didn't.

Heck, by Kirk's own admission there weren't that many Connies, Starfleet could have simply decided that it wasn't worth the money to keep a handful of Connies running where as its more financially sound to keep several hundred Mirandas going.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Mikey »

It doesn't matter if it's easy to envision a TOS-style Miranda; the fact is that there is no such canon (or even background - thanks Vic) ship.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by DSG2k »

stitch626 wrote:Do remember the remains of a Constitution was seen in the fleet of Wolf 359.
Not necessarily. The secondary hull design (which is all that is seen) could've been used on another class. Picard explicitly puts the Constitution as being out of service in the 2360's, per "Relics".

And after all, there were only 12 in the 2260's despite at least seven being built in the 2240's.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by stitch626 »

DSG2k wrote:
stitch626 wrote:Do remember the remains of a Constitution was seen in the fleet of Wolf 359.
Not necessarily. The secondary hull design (which is all that is seen) could've been used on another class. Picard explicitly puts the Constitution as being out of service in the 2360's, per "Relics".

And after all, there were only 12 in the 2260's despite at least seven being built in the 2240's.
Considering we have not seen any other canon ship with a Constitution hull, canon wise, it must be a Constitution class ship.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Captain Seafort »

stitch626 wrote:Considering we have not seen any other canon ship with a Constitution hull, canon wise, it must be a Constitution class ship.
Indeed. OOU we know for a fact that it was a Connie because the model was that of the E-nil blown up in TSFS.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by DSG2k »

stitch626 wrote:
DSG2k wrote:
stitch626 wrote:Do remember the remains of a Constitution was seen in the fleet of Wolf 359.
Not necessarily. The secondary hull design (which is all that is seen) could've been used on another class. Picard explicitly puts the Constitution as being out of service in the 2360's, per "Relics".

And after all, there were only 12 in the 2260's despite at least seven being built in the 2240's.
Considering we have not seen any other canon ship with a Constitution hull, canon wise, it must be a Constitution class ship.
That's an illogical supposition (argumentum ad ignorantium, specifically). By that logic, we have seen all the Starfleet ship classes and must assume that all other vessels must be a part of one of the classes we've seen, but that's silly for anyone who's ever seen the class-happiness of TNG and been introduced to older but previously-unseen classes (e.g. the Ambassador, Nebula, the Akira, Norway, Saber, Olympic, et cetera).

Picard's statement therefore stands. You could argue that they took an uprated Constitution museum ship (that was not the Enterprise) out to Wolf 359 and lost it, but that doesn't make a great deal of sense either. Museum ships historically aren't exactly battle-ready. It would make more sense for them to have taken out the training ship Republic, but evidently they did not.

Finally, it isn't like we got a good angle on the supposed Constitution secondary hull. We get a very partial view of the arboretum area from below . . . no nacelles, no nacelle struts, not even a clearly identifiable saucer connection interhull. Given the kitbash ships we've seen (e.g. a Miranda rollbar with Excelsior bits on the Centaur), the notion that this hull fragment must be declared to be of a Constitution hull only is peculiar in the extreme.

But, believe whatever you wish.
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by stitch626 »

Its not belief, its canon. Canon rules all unless overwritten by other canon. It looks like a Connie. There are no canon ships that make use of the Connie hull. Therefore, it must have been a Connie. Therefore, the Constitution Class must have an operable ship during TNG.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Tyyr
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10654
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:49 pm
Location: Jeri Ryan's Dressing Room, Shhhhh

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by Tyyr »

DSG2k wrote:That's an illogical supposition
No, it's not.
By that logic, we have seen all the Starfleet ship classes and must assume that all other vessels must be a part of one of the classes we've seen, but that's silly for anyone who's ever seen the class-happiness of TNG and been introduced to older but previously-unseen classes (e.g. the Ambassador, Nebula, the Akira, Norway, Saber, Olympic, et cetera).
Are you intentionally being daft? None of the ships you've mentioned are ambiguous in the least. They've been on screen in all their glory and are obviously different classes. Trying to extend the belief that what was seen at Wolf359 is a Connie and using that as the basis to leap off into an utterly asinine argument to try and discredit someone who disagrees with you is dishonest at best, pure asshattery at worst.

Given the visual evidence it makes far more sense to ascribe what appears to be a Connie hull to being a Connie rather than inventing some new class of ship based on very scant visual evidence. When confronted with something that is obviously a new ship it makes logical sense to ascribe a new class to it, ie the Centaur. When confronted with something that doesn't appear to be a new ship but rather part of a previous one then ascribing it to the existing class is the logical thing to do.

From the evidence the best fit for what we see is part of a Constitution. We have no evidence of another class of ship that uses a Connie's secondary hull. Given that nothing that we see deviates from a Connie then logic says it's a Connie. This is only reinforced by the fact that the actual model used WAS A CONNIE. Now, whether or not you like the implications of a Constitution being at the battle of Wolf359 is irrelevant. All the visual evidence in universe and out of it points to a Connie being there and we're just going to have to deal with it.
User avatar
DSG2k
Lieutenant jg
Lieutenant jg
Posts: 217
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:39 am
Contact:

Re: What is the 23rd Century Starfleet?

Post by DSG2k »

Oh good lord.
Tyyr wrote:Are you intentionally being daft?
No, I left that to you, and you came through for me. Thank you.
None of the ships you've mentioned are ambiguous in the least.
Because we have seen them now, as opposed to when they were -- and here I quote myself -- "previously-unseen".

Lest you fail to understand, I shall explain it to you slowly . . . this means that before those ship classes were seen, we did not know of them. Ergo, someone who is engaged in the starship class version of argumentum ad ignorantium (we don't know other classes exists, therefore they can't, and therefore Ship X must be a part of a known class) would therefore have claimed prior to their appearance that any such class could not exist, and that all other starships must be of known-extant classes.

That would hold right up until the new class appeared. Except whereas the argumentum ad ignorantium guy would be shocked -- shocked, I say! -- to have a new class upset the delicate balance of his life, someone not constrained by such illogic would say "oh, neat."
utterly asinine argument to try and discredit someone who disagrees with you is dishonest at best, pure asshattery at worst.
If you're not going to read what I say and, from there, leap to asinine asshattery of your own while trying to accuse me of such . . . well, you'll find I don't respond well to such dishonesty.
Given the visual evidence it makes far more sense to ascribe what appears to be a Connie hull to being a Connie rather than inventing some new class of ship based on very scant visual evidence.
Based on "very scant visual evidence" you would seek to claim a contradiction of Picard's statement that there is but one Constitution and that it is in the fleet museum, with all the absurdity that entails.

Based on "very scant visual evidence" you would take a sliver of what looks like a Constitution secondary hull and conclude that the entire Constitution class must still be active, despite the fact that Constitution-style saucers and nacelles show up in many other classes, as if having that small part of a Constitution secondary hull (the only piece not seen to be repeated) would be impossible to repeat in another class.

To review, this little sliver of ship:

Image

. . . which could just as easily be the saucer of an Oberth for all the detail we get of it . . . is considered to be proof of the non-retirement of the entire Constitution Class, despite it not showing the neck to any saucer or the struts to any nacelles (meaning it could connect to anything from almost any angle save for those we see), and despite clear evidence of the class retirement from Picard and ST6.

So, despite my saying "believe whatever you wish" after stating my case and discrediting yours, you seek to insult those who might dare disagree with your fallacy-based viewpoint. More to the point, when the fallacious basis of your argument (even if we grant that it is a secondary hull tube of the Constitution type) is pointed out, with re-iteration of the canon statements made, you get nasty and flamy.

Very peculiar. Seems like you're emotionally invested in the survival of the class. You may want to reconsider that.

But in any case, are we done now? Do you get the point, and can we go back to being polite as we discuss the silly hull fragment on a sci-fi show, or do you want to go on trying to insult me over a sci-fi show while clearly making a fool of yourself? If the latter, don't expect me to stop you . . . I'll just sit back and watch the show like this:

:laughroll: :wave:
Last edited by DSG2k on Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked