Weapons and Warfare

Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Mikey »

lol, I didn't mean that to sound as dick-headed as it reads. But this is a good example of Hollywood hindsight. There is a romantic aspect attached to the Tommy gun, completely unrelated to its success as a weapon.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Deepcrush »

It was also the primary automatic of the Marine Corps for WWII. It was a common weapon issued to our allies in Asia. As well as a fav among Paratroopers and Rangers. The fact that it is played up so much MAKES it a notorious weapon.

Outside of that, the IRS, Secret Service and FBI favored the weapon until the MP5 came about. Even then only changed over in order to better work with foreign police forces. Not because they decided the weapon wasn't good enough.
Mikey wrote:Oh, and Deep - it's not a load. If you learn to read, you'll see I said what it's famous for... nothing to do with the quality of the weapon. Out of every 100 average guys, 95 would probably know the Tommy gun best as the gun of Capone-era gangsters.
Right, this is so cute because I of course never read about weapons. Its not like I have an entire life built around conflict in one form or another. God knows those bookshelves are really empty, not covered in bits of paper about this very subject... I get you've got shit going on in your life but you can fuck it off. A weapon is notorious for being known. Read your own quote and figure it out.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Sonic Glitch
Rear Admiral
Rear Admiral
Posts: 6026
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Sonic Glitch »

Someone mentioned that there are weapons which just "scream" into the history books (or something along those lines), which dredged up a memory I'd like to nominate the JU-87 Stuka as a notorious weapon -- both psychologically and in terms of damage.
Image
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
User avatar
Deepcrush
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 18917
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Deepcrush »

Truly notorious for its time. Thats for sure!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Mikey »

Indeed. So iconic that the sound it made - besides instilling fear - became known as the typical sound of any attack plane, even though it was artificial.

Deep - G-d bless you. :lol:

First, I apologize for the "learn to read" crack. It was meant in fun, but it obviously stung you so I'm sorry for that. I think the issue here is that you think I'm disagreeing with you about the viability of the Tommy gun. I'm not. It was a great weapon, especially for its time.
Deepcrush wrote:It was also the primary automatic of the Marine Corps for WWII. It was a common weapon issued to our allies in Asia. As well as a fav among Paratroopers and Rangers.
In other words, exactly what I had mentioned. I just added the fact (true) fact that the M3 had replaced it by 1942 in the regular Army.
Deepcrush wrote:Outside of that, the IRS, Secret Service and FBI favored the weapon until the MP5 came about. Even then only changed over in order to better work with foreign police forces. Not because they decided the weapon wasn't good enough.
Yep. Like I said, I never said, hinted, or implied that it wasn't a great weapon. But that usage by the units you mention added to its mystique as a weapon of the Gangland era.
Deepcrush wrote:Right, this is so cute because I of course never read about weapons. Its not like I have an entire life built around conflict in one form or another. God knows those bookshelves are really empty, not covered in bits of paper about this very subject...
Dude, I know for a fact that you have an extensive knowledge of weapons and most things military. Far more than I, I'll readily admit and not be humbled to do so. However, none of that is really germane here. The fact is - and it bears repeating - that I never knocked the Thompson as a weapon. What I said is that the modern fame of the weapon is due to its portrayal in film and television. The average guy on the street does NOT have your knowledge of military history, or your detailed knowledge of firearms. To that Joe Bag-o-donuts, the Thompson is famous because of things like The Untouchables. This does not mean that it wasn't a good gun; it means that the average guy - by whom "fame" is properly measured - doesn't know about all the other stuff.
Deepcrush wrote:I get you've got s**t going on in your life but you can f**k it off.
In fact, we've all got sh*t to deal with. However, I've got a wife with whom I'm madly in love and two incredible children. Anything else is inconsequential compared to that. I know you had a sh*t day at work yesterday, and I again apologize for pushing your button. I know enough teachers to understand that despite your persona, a good day for you means NOT having to put your hands on a kid.
Deepcrush wrote:A weapon is notorious for being known.
And here I thought "notorious" meant "being yellow with pink polka-dots." See above - I agree with the fact that the Tommy gun is widely known; it's just known for different reasons among the bulk of the masses than by the much-smaller number of people with detailed military knowledge.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
stitch626
2 Star Admiral
2 Star Admiral
Posts: 9585
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by stitch626 »

I asked people yesterday, what they thought of the Tommy. They said, "That machine gun from the movies, right?" And honestly, thats the first thing I think of for it as well.

Just like many kids will think F-22=Starscream, and completely forget that it is the newest (at the time of the movie) fighter jet.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Aaron »

Mikey wrote:lol, I didn't mean that to sound as dick-headed as it reads. But this is a good example of Hollywood hindsight. There is a romantic aspect attached to the Tommy gun, completely unrelated to its success as a weapon.
:lol: No problem dude.
User avatar
Reliant121
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 12263
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Reliant121 »

When I think of "sub machine gun" i instantly recall the MP40. I don't know, I have just never held much view for the Thompson. Maybe because i've never liked it in video games :wink:
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Mikey »

The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
colmquinn
Commander
Commander
Posts: 1496
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:20 pm
Location: Waiting in the long grass

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by colmquinn »

Iconic sub machines guns would be the Uzi or the HK MP5 for me.
But I can't throw, I throw like a geek!
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Captain Seafort »

Mikey wrote:The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
Given that this is a sci-fi forum, I don't see how you can call the Stirling anything but an iconic weapon. :wink:
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Aaron »

Ah yes, the Sterling. A weapon that would go off and spin in a circle if you dropped it.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
4 Star Admiral
4 Star Admiral
Posts: 15548
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Blighty

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Captain Seafort »

Ouch. :shock: Did this happen with the safety on, and was it ever fixed?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
Aaron
3 Star Admiral
3 Star Admiral
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Aaron »

Captain Seafort wrote:Ouch. :shock: Did this happen with the safety on, and was it ever fixed?
I vaguely recall that it didn't have a safety, when you cocked it, the handle went up into a grove and that was it.

Edit. Wait, yeah it did. And yes it would with the safety on.
Mikey
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 35635
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
Commendations: The Daystrom Award
Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
Contact:

Re: Weapons and Warfare

Post by Mikey »

Was that because of the imbalance from the side-mounted mag?
Captain Seafort wrote:
Mikey wrote:The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
Given that this is a sci-fi forum, I don't see how you can call the Stirling anything but an iconic weapon. :wink:
Pretend (:p) that I'm dense... I'm not following, unless you're making a Serling/Sterling joke.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Post Reply