Weapons and Warfare
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
lol, I didn't mean that to sound as dick-headed as it reads. But this is a good example of Hollywood hindsight. There is a romantic aspect attached to the Tommy gun, completely unrelated to its success as a weapon.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Weapons and Warfare
It was also the primary automatic of the Marine Corps for WWII. It was a common weapon issued to our allies in Asia. As well as a fav among Paratroopers and Rangers. The fact that it is played up so much MAKES it a notorious weapon.
Outside of that, the IRS, Secret Service and FBI favored the weapon until the MP5 came about. Even then only changed over in order to better work with foreign police forces. Not because they decided the weapon wasn't good enough.
Outside of that, the IRS, Secret Service and FBI favored the weapon until the MP5 came about. Even then only changed over in order to better work with foreign police forces. Not because they decided the weapon wasn't good enough.
Right, this is so cute because I of course never read about weapons. Its not like I have an entire life built around conflict in one form or another. God knows those bookshelves are really empty, not covered in bits of paper about this very subject... I get you've got shit going on in your life but you can fuck it off. A weapon is notorious for being known. Read your own quote and figure it out.Mikey wrote:Oh, and Deep - it's not a load. If you learn to read, you'll see I said what it's famous for... nothing to do with the quality of the weapon. Out of every 100 average guys, 95 would probably know the Tommy gun best as the gun of Capone-era gangsters.
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Rear Admiral
- Posts: 6026
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 2:11 am
- Location: Any ol' place here on Earth or in space. You pick the century and I'll pick the spot
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Someone mentioned that there are weapons which just "scream" into the history books (or something along those lines), which dredged up a memory I'd like to nominate the JU-87 Stuka as a notorious weapon -- both psychologically and in terms of damage.
"All this has happened before --"
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
"But it doesn't have to happen again. Not if we make up our minds to change. Take a different path. Right here, right now."
- Deepcrush
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 18917
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:15 pm
- Location: Arnold, Maryland, USA
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Truly notorious for its time. Thats for sure!
Jinsei wa cho no yume, shi no tsubasa no bitodesu
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Indeed. So iconic that the sound it made - besides instilling fear - became known as the typical sound of any attack plane, even though it was artificial.
Deep - G-d bless you.
First, I apologize for the "learn to read" crack. It was meant in fun, but it obviously stung you so I'm sorry for that. I think the issue here is that you think I'm disagreeing with you about the viability of the Tommy gun. I'm not. It was a great weapon, especially for its time.
Deep - G-d bless you.
First, I apologize for the "learn to read" crack. It was meant in fun, but it obviously stung you so I'm sorry for that. I think the issue here is that you think I'm disagreeing with you about the viability of the Tommy gun. I'm not. It was a great weapon, especially for its time.
In other words, exactly what I had mentioned. I just added the fact (true) fact that the M3 had replaced it by 1942 in the regular Army.Deepcrush wrote:It was also the primary automatic of the Marine Corps for WWII. It was a common weapon issued to our allies in Asia. As well as a fav among Paratroopers and Rangers.
Yep. Like I said, I never said, hinted, or implied that it wasn't a great weapon. But that usage by the units you mention added to its mystique as a weapon of the Gangland era.Deepcrush wrote:Outside of that, the IRS, Secret Service and FBI favored the weapon until the MP5 came about. Even then only changed over in order to better work with foreign police forces. Not because they decided the weapon wasn't good enough.
Dude, I know for a fact that you have an extensive knowledge of weapons and most things military. Far more than I, I'll readily admit and not be humbled to do so. However, none of that is really germane here. The fact is - and it bears repeating - that I never knocked the Thompson as a weapon. What I said is that the modern fame of the weapon is due to its portrayal in film and television. The average guy on the street does NOT have your knowledge of military history, or your detailed knowledge of firearms. To that Joe Bag-o-donuts, the Thompson is famous because of things like The Untouchables. This does not mean that it wasn't a good gun; it means that the average guy - by whom "fame" is properly measured - doesn't know about all the other stuff.Deepcrush wrote:Right, this is so cute because I of course never read about weapons. Its not like I have an entire life built around conflict in one form or another. God knows those bookshelves are really empty, not covered in bits of paper about this very subject...
In fact, we've all got sh*t to deal with. However, I've got a wife with whom I'm madly in love and two incredible children. Anything else is inconsequential compared to that. I know you had a sh*t day at work yesterday, and I again apologize for pushing your button. I know enough teachers to understand that despite your persona, a good day for you means NOT having to put your hands on a kid.Deepcrush wrote:I get you've got s**t going on in your life but you can f**k it off.
And here I thought "notorious" meant "being yellow with pink polka-dots." See above - I agree with the fact that the Tommy gun is widely known; it's just known for different reasons among the bulk of the masses than by the much-smaller number of people with detailed military knowledge.Deepcrush wrote:A weapon is notorious for being known.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
Re: Weapons and Warfare
I asked people yesterday, what they thought of the Tommy. They said, "That machine gun from the movies, right?" And honestly, thats the first thing I think of for it as well.
Just like many kids will think F-22=Starscream, and completely forget that it is the newest (at the time of the movie) fighter jet.
Just like many kids will think F-22=Starscream, and completely forget that it is the newest (at the time of the movie) fighter jet.
No trees were killed in transmission of this message. However, some electrons were mildly inconvenienced.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
No problem dude.Mikey wrote:lol, I didn't mean that to sound as dick-headed as it reads. But this is a good example of Hollywood hindsight. There is a romantic aspect attached to the Tommy gun, completely unrelated to its success as a weapon.
- Reliant121
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 12263
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:00 pm
Re: Weapons and Warfare
When I think of "sub machine gun" i instantly recall the MP40. I don't know, I have just never held much view for the Thompson. Maybe because i've never liked it in video games
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
-
- Commander
- Posts: 1496
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:20 pm
- Location: Waiting in the long grass
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Iconic sub machines guns would be the Uzi or the HK MP5 for me.
But I can't throw, I throw like a geek!
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Given that this is a sci-fi forum, I don't see how you can call the Stirling anything but an iconic weapon.Mikey wrote:The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Ah yes, the Sterling. A weapon that would go off and spin in a circle if you dropped it.
- Captain Seafort
- 4 Star Admiral
- Posts: 15548
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:44 pm
- Location: Blighty
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Ouch. Did this happen with the safety on, and was it ever fixed?
Only two things are infinite - the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the universe: Albert Einstein.
-
- 3 Star Admiral
- Posts: 10988
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: Timepire Mobile Command Centre
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
I vaguely recall that it didn't have a safety, when you cocked it, the handle went up into a grove and that was it.Captain Seafort wrote:Ouch. Did this happen with the safety on, and was it ever fixed?
Edit. Wait, yeah it did. And yes it would with the safety on.
-
- Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 35635
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 3:04 am
- Commendations: The Daystrom Award
- Location: down the shore, New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
Re: Weapons and Warfare
Was that because of the imbalance from the side-mounted mag?
Pretend (:p) that I'm dense... I'm not following, unless you're making a Serling/Sterling joke.Captain Seafort wrote:Given that this is a sci-fi forum, I don't see how you can call the Stirling anything but an iconic weapon.Mikey wrote:The MP40 was certainly iconic in that it influenced a great deal of subsequent SMG design... as did the Sterling. I would say that the difference is that the Thompson (for whatever reason!) became an iconic weapon, not just an iconic SMG.
I can't stand nothing dull
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer
I got the high gloss luster
I'll massacre your ass as fast
as Bull offed Custer