Leonard Nimoy speaks about his Photography

Grundig · Post by **Grundig** » Wed Dec 05, 2007 10:50 pm

I didn't see this anywhere else on the forum, but I found it very interesting.

The Story:
http://smithmag.net/2007/12/01/full-on- ... ment-54826

Jim · Post by **Jim** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 12:23 pm

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:40 pm

Uh, firstly I'd just point out for the sake of other members that you should probably not click on that link if you're in work...or at least don't start the video.

Secondly, and as for the article itself......................
.....................
....................
...................
..................
seriously.....what the heck?

Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 5:28 pm

I honestly don't see the problem. Nimoy is no Ansel Adams, but he's not a hack, either. If Roy Lichtenstein can become a famous artist for painting super-sized Bazooka Joe comics, why can't Nimoy photograph zaftig women?

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:11 pm

I've no problem with it either. It just seemed so...random.

Grundig · Post by **Grundig** » Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:10 am

Rochey wrote:Uh, firstly I'd just point out for the sake of other members that you should probably not click on that link if you're in work...or at least don't start the video.

Yeah, sorry about not warning you. But in all honesty, I was completely unaware that that was a video! I thought it was the one-and-only picture in the article. Yeah. NOT WORK SAFE!

I just posted it for the interview's contents.

Bryan Moore · Post by **Bryan Moore** » Thu Dec 27, 2007 4:04 am

I like my girls on the medium to slightly large size... perhaps not this large. However, it certainly gets a nice big WTF and then a second look. The photography is cool if that's your thing. The interview was great.