Nobody is able to defend themselves from a bullet over a distance. Does that make it more grievous?Tsukiyumi wrote:I disagree with that particular part; I do, however, believe that killing a child would be a more grievous offense, and deserves a harsher punishment.IanKennedy wrote:So you are saying that a cops life is more important than yours, and you seem to be happy with that. Ones job, or lack there of, should not define your worth as a human being. The crime of deliberately killing you should be just the same as killing a cop. You are no less of a human being.
No it would be exactly the same. There is no crime of any kind left in the UK which results in capital punishment. That includes regicide as well as Arson in the Queens dockyards.Like I said, I don't agree about the police; the child is different. I can potentially defend myself - the child can't.Captain Seafort wrote:And what exactly would make your murder a less serious offence than that of a policeman or child?
As an example, if someone shot the Queen, or Prince William, would they be treated the same, and charged with the same thing as someone who shot "Random schmoe A"? I know over here, shooting the President would be considered a capital offense.