Want to blaspheme? That'll be 20 years in prison.

[Sionnach Glic]

Afghan Court Backs Prison Term for Blasphemy

KABUL, Afghanistan - The Supreme Court in Afghanistan has upheld a 20-year prison sentence for an Afghan university student journalist accused of blasphemy. The case has alarmed news media and rights organizations in the country and abroad.

The student's family and lawyers said Wednesday that they had learned only recently about the court decision, which was made in secret on Feb. 12, and they called the procedure illegal.

The student, Parwiz Kambakhsh, 24, from northern Afghanistan, was arrested in 2007 and sentenced to death for blasphemy after accusations that he had written and distributed an article about the role of women in Islam. Mr. Kambakhsh has denied having written the article and said he had downloaded it from the Internet. His family and lawyers say he has been denied a fair trial.

In 2008, an appeals court in Kabul commuted the death sentence to 20 years' imprisonment, a decision that was upheld by a tribunal of the Supreme Court last month.

"Unfortunately the Supreme Court has confirmed the 20-year prison sentence for my brother," said Yaqoub Ibrahimi, who is Mr. Kambakhsh's brother. "We did not expect it at all."

The decision came to light only when the attorney general's office issued orders to the northern province of Balkh to enforce the decision, Afzal Nooristani, a defense lawyer for Mr. Kambakhsh, said in a telephone interview.

"I was not allowed to talk with the judges and officials, which is a complete violation of law," he said.

Judges at the Supreme Court were reluctant to comment on the case, except to say that Ghulam Nabi Nawaie, the lead judge of the tribunal that made the decision, was in India for medical treatment.

Enayatullah Kamal, the deputy attorney general, confirmed that his office had been notified of the decision, but he said Mr. Kambakhsh still had the right to appeal the tribunal's decision.

The case has been watched keenly by the independent Afghan news media, which have felt growing pressure from government, political and religious circles. Journalists and news organizations flourished in the early post-Taliban years under President Hamid Karzai, but have increasingly suffered from threats and attacks from the Taliban and pressure from the government and religious conservatives.

An Afghan journalist, Javed Ahmad, 23, who worked for the Canadian broadcaster CTV, was gunned down Tuesday evening in the center of the southern city of Kandahar, the second killing of an Afghan journalist in southern Afghanistan in nine months. Abdul Samad Rohani, a journalist in Helmand Province, was shot dead last year, in a killing thought to be connected to his investigation of police involvement in the drug trade.

Three other well-established journalists have left Kandahar in recent months after receiving threats from Taliban insurgents over their coverage of events.

Another journalist, Ghows Zalmai, has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for blasphemy after publishing a Dari translation of the Koran that hard-line clerics disputed, said Human Rights Watch, based in New York.

Western diplomats and human rights organizations have expressed concern that despite Mr. Karzai's assurances of press freedom and freedom of speech, journalists and civilians are under an increasing threat from both insurgents and conservative religious clerics allied with the government. Mr. Karzai, his critics say, is reluctant to move against the clerics in an election year.

Mr. Kambakhsh's brother and the lawyer, Mr. Nooristani, said they were dismayed because they had seen the Supreme Court as their last resort. Mr. Kambakhsh was originally sentenced after a trial lasting only minutes in which he was not allowed to defend himself. In the appeals court, an important student witness against him retracted his statement, but was ignored.

"This is the tragic level of justice in Afghanistan today," Mr. Ibrahimi, the brother, said in a statement. "It is just a make-believe system of justice and humanitarianism. The reality is that the Afghan government and judiciary, although supported by the U.S., the U.N., the E.U. and other democracies worldwide, is morally bankrupt."

Human Rights Watch urged the Afghan president to pardon Mr. Kambakhsh. "The Supreme Court represented the last hope that Parwiz Kambakhsh would receive a fair hearing, but once again justice was denied," said Brad Adams, the organization's Asia director. "Kambakhsh has committed no crime."

Abdul Waheed Wafa reported from Kabul, Afghanistan, and Carlotta Gall from Islamabad, Pakistan. Taimoor Shah contributed reporting from Kandahar, Afghanistan.

[Captain Seafort]

A death sentence commuted to 20 years? Progress of sorts, I suppose.

[Lazar]

A while ago there was also the case of that Afghan guy, Abdul Rahman, who converted to Christianity and was sentenced to death, with the clerics and the people pretty solidly backing the sentence. Other countries made a big stir about it, and eventually he managed to receive asylum in Italy.

[Mikey]

I don't really see anything to be surprised about. In a country with a state religion, either constitutionally or de facto, it's to be expected that there will be judicial and legislative responses to ecclesiastical matters.

[Teaos]

Why don't they just let him live and let "God" judge him.

[Aaron]

I've said before and I'll say it again; we should have handed them their constitution rather then letting them enshrine their BS religious law into it.

You might find this of interest.

President Hamid Karzai has signed a law the UN says legalises rape in marriage and prevents women from leaving the house without permission.


By Ben Farmer in Kabul
Last Updated: 7:57AM BST 31 Mar 2009
Hamid Karzai: Hamid Karzai signs law 'legalising rape in marriage'
Mr Karzai has been accused of electioneering at the expense of women's rights by signing the law to appeal to crucial Shia swing voters in this year's presidential poll Photo: AFP/GETTY

The law, which has not been publicly released, is believed to state women can only seek work, education or doctor's appointments with their husband's permission.

Only fathers and grandfathers are granted custody of children under the law, according to the United Nations Development Fund for Women.

Opponents of the legislation governing the personal lives of Afghanistan's Shia minority have said it is "worse than during the Taliban".

Mr Karzai has been accused of electioneering at the expense of women's rights by signing the law to appeal to crucial Shia swing voters in this year's presidential poll.

While the Afghan constitution guarantees equal rights for women, it also allows the Shia community, thought to represent 10 per cent of the population, the right to settle family law cases according to Shia law.

The Shiite Personal Status Law contains provisions on marriage, divorce, inheritance, rights of movement and bankruptcy.

The bill passed both houses of the Afghan parliament, but was so contentious that the United Nations and women's rights campaigners have so far been unable to see a copy of the approved bill.

Shinkai Zahine Karokhail, a female MP, said the law had been rushed through with little debate.

She told the Guardian newspaper: "They wanted to pass it almost like a secret negotiation, "There were lots of things that we wanted to change, but they didn't want to discuss it because Karzai wants to please the Shia before the election."

The Afghan justice ministry confirmed the law had been signed, but said it would not be published until technical difficulties had been overcome.

A spokesman for President Hamid Karzai would not comment.

Afghanistan is a fucking joke and the worst part of it is that we created it.

[Teaos]

Yeah lets force our morals on them, thats gonna work.

[Lazar]

I agree; I think it's foolish to try to impose liberal democracy on a country that doesn't want it.

[stitch626]

And so it begins.

[Lt. Staplic]

AFAIK the last time we "handed" a country a constitution and told them how to behave, we wound up placing an embargo on them, and praying they didn't launch Russias nukes at us.

[Aaron]

AFAIK the last time we "handed" a country a constitution and told them how to behave, we wound up placing an embargo on them, and praying they didn't launch Russias nukes at us.

It worked for Japan didn't it? Frankly I think we should just go "you want our help? Then you do x,y and z, if not then see you later".

[Teaos]

Want our help?

I must have missed the "Please invade us" signs back in 01-02.

[Aaron]

Want our help?

I must have missed the "Please invade us" signs back in 01-02.

Yeah? Offering aid and shelter to Bin Laden might not have been a good idea then. Regardless of what happened then, the government does want our help and frequently begs for more troops because theirs are fucking useless and corrupt. If they want it then they should damn well act like the modern country they claim to want to be. If not then I have no qualms about leaving them to wallow in their own feces.

And yes, if they decide they want our help them I fully support shoveling money into their education system and general infrastructure until things change, otherwise we'll likely be repeating this in 30 years.

[Mikey]

It would have been tough to go in and tell them how to play in their own sandbox, after we set up the mujahadin as fundamentalist guerillas to fight the Russians for us.

[Aaron]

It would have been tough to go in and tell them how to play in their own sandbox, after we set up the mujahadin as fundamentalist guerillas to fight the Russians for us.

True but we can't have it both ways, either we swallow our rhetoric about human rights or we tell them it isn't acceptable and leave. Afghanistan isn't like China which can ignore us and exist, if we leave then they are fucked, the country will descend into civil war and Karzai will probably be hung from a lampost.