40 AQ members killed by Plague

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:26 pm

I know the Sun isn't a great source, but I see no reason to doubt it in this case. It's neither an extra-ordinary or controversial claim. The fact that the same story was reported by three, admittedly poor, papers would seem to lend credence to it.

Post by **Teaos** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:50 am

Repeating BS 3 times doesnt make it true.

Lazar · Post by **Lazar** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:55 am

Yeah, I'd like to see it confirmed by some other source.

Sionnach Glic · Post by **Sionnach Glic** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:03 pm

Will Washington Times do?

Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:23 pm

OK, that's a little more credible. Here's my question: while the bubonic plague is indeed deadly and terror-inducing, it's not transmissible as an aerosol, or even via water - it must be physically introduced into bodily fluids (e.g., flea bite.) Wouldn't that make a pretty poor bio-weapon?

40 AQ members killed by Plague

Re: 40 AQ members killed by Plague

Re: 40 AQ members killed by Plague

Re: 40 AQ members killed by Plague

Re: 40 AQ members killed by Plague

Re: 40 AQ members killed by Plague