Find the Founders II discusion thread

[Nickswitz]

Wrong thread Teoas. But only my bro dies. Right. we win?

[Teaos]

Technically Stitch and I died, but there is nothing you could do about me dying. Good guys win, again.

I'll be in for round 3.

[Nickswitz]

OK yeah. We thought this time. But we need more people to sign up. We should advertise the game in other threads.

[Tsukiyumi]

Dammit. I know this would've gone differently if I hadn't been off-line for so long. Oh well... I'll do better in the next round.

[Mark]

This from the walking liquid-gel

J/K, bro. I thought you did quite well. It was just luck for Grundig that he scanned your blood first thing, otherwise things would quite possibly have gone quite differently.

[Tsukiyumi]

It was just luck for Grundig that he scanned your blood first thing, otherwise things would quite possibly have gone quite differently.

The real luck was Grundig's. He was my primary option for a first kill, as I suspected he'd have an important position. We went with Stitch due to a comment he made.

[Nickswitz]

Which one?

[Tsukiyumi]

Which one?

Like I'm going to give tips to possible future Founders.

[Mark]

Ok......who has any suggestions that they would like to see in FtF III to make it better???

[Tsukiyumi]

Have some evidence at the beginning to implicate Founders as the cause, so we don't have four pages of "I wonder what killed him/her?"

[Mark]

What do you guys think about time limits??? Do you think that say 3 real world days would be enough time before a "mandatory" night fell?

[Grundig]

Wow, what happened!?? I go to Vegas for one weekend, and the game's over. Good guess on Reliant! I wasn't sure about him. I was more thinking of Mark because of what Tsukiumi said towards the end there.

I'm in for another game. I don't have any ideas on improving the gameplay at the moment, but I'll think about it. Time limits are probably good. The founders should have more working in their favor - it seems really hard for them to win as it is. Was there a security guy? Who was it?

[Teaos]

I'll let the security guard out himself if he wants to, but he can stay hidden.

I agree on a 3 day time limit before a manditory sleep, that is unless we are really close to doing something (as in holding a vote and just waiting for someone else to vote). This game dragged on for 2 weeks with nothing happening then I came in and said I was forcing a sleep and all of the sudden you pushed Tsu out the airlock. It drive the game foward.

Also I would make it manditory RP. Quite a few people were RPing then Grundig came in not realising they were doing it and started talking about the old game and stuff outside of the RPing which really threw people off.

I dont think we need to give the founders any advantages. The first game they did really well until Nic got cocky, they probably would have won, This game it was dumb luck that Grundig found out Tsu.

[Mark]

For the next game, if you guys agree, I'd like to only allow one execution per "day". The last two games seems to come to an abrupt halt when both founders get pushed out the airlock in the same round. What do you guys think? Also, I was thinking that maybe as mod, I could toss out a couple of subtle clues to get things going. What do you think???

[Teaos]

I dont think that will work. Think about it.

6 people playing.

2 founders 4 normal.

One person is pretty much guaranteed to die right away since you cant airlock someone with our evidence.

That means your down to 2 founders and 3 normal.

If you kill an innocent on your first execution which is very possible (you killed me for no reason) its game over as it is then tied 2 all and the founders win.

I see no problem with the current format. Thus game we had luck on our side and the first game they almost won if it wasnt for my brilliant move of killing myself and Nic getting sloppy.